Commentary
Donating a kidney is a good deed that doesn't go unpunished
By Cathleen Cotter
Cathleen Cotter, St. Paul, is a business analyst with the state of Minnesota.
Sometime in the next few days, I'll get a thank-you card in the mail. It won't say much, but it'll contain the date June 19, 2007, and will be signed "With love from Bill & Joanie."
That's the day I donated a kidney to Bill and Joanie's son Luke. Since then, Luke has gotten married and had a son of his own. Since then, I've never given a thought to possible negative consequences of my choice — until now.
Now I know that my insurance company, Blue Cross and Blue Shield, would deny me health insurance if I were applying as an individual. BCBS apparently believes I am high risk, even though I had to be in excellent health in order to donate a kidney. BCBS seems to think that people like me will be fine getting health insurance through the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association high-risk pool.
And BCBS doesn't realize it holds these opinions about me, because I have been a client for over 15 years through my employer.
Last week the New York Times ran a story about Radburn Royer, a retired teacher in Eveleth, Minn., who donated a kidney to his daughter, Erika, four years ago. Last year he applied for private insurance through BCBS. He was denied coverage, on the grounds that he suffered from kidney disease, although his doctor said his kidney was healthy.
When people ask why I donated a kidney, I have trouble explaining what an easy choice it was for me. Luke and I are second cousins; his grandmother and my grandfather were siblings. I had never heard of him until I read a letter his parents had written to friends and family, a letter one of my aunts shared with our "Cotter cousins" email group. We're a far-flung clan and for years we've had a newsletter that has evolved with technology.
When I read Bill and Joanie's letter, my reaction was, "I'd do this in a heartbeat for one of my kids. Shouldn't I be willing to do it for someone else's kid?"
For me, it was that simple. But I understand others who struggle with the decision to donate. It's major surgery. Recovery takes months. And no matter how often you ask, the surgeons will not perform even a tiny bit of liposuction while they have you on the table.
Dialysis is awful; it causes bloating and cramping and it leaves patients exhausted. Luke once told me he couldn't ever remember seeing the end of a movie before the transplant. Kidney transplant surgery is cost effective; studies have estimated it pays for itself in two years. So why would BCBS, or any insurer, deliberately tip the scale against the choice to donate?
This policy horrifies me. And it makes me angry. How can a nonprofit health service corporation justify this practice when it's neither good fiscal policy nor good public policy?
I never wanted to be compensated for donating my kidney. I danced at Luke's wedding and I've made his son laugh. That's enough for me. But I never expected to be penalized, and especially not by my insurance company.
I work for a large employer and haven't faced discrimination trying to obtain private insurance. I like to think it wouldn't have affected my decision to donate. But I like to think lots of noble things about myself. I am grateful I don't have to face the question again.
Comments (5)
My father in law has had the same experience. No coverage from BCBS for a perfectly healthy man because he saved his daughter's life by donating a kidney. His story is here: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/11/the-reward-for-donating-a-kidney-no-insurance/
I would consider a health Sharing network like http://www.samaritanministries.org
It is a great alternative to health insurance and allows people to help each other instead of leaning on insurance companies and the government for our health problems. We recently had a baby boy and the bill was over $18,000. We were able to pay all our bills in cash!
I donated a kidney to a family member also and would do it again in a heartbeat (the decision was as easy for me as it was for you), but it's discouraging that BCBS feels that my health risks are greater than if I hadn't donated. And because I have been self-employed in the past and may be so again in the future, I might have to face the issue of health insurance coverage personally.
You have to consider BCBS' position. It is a corporation and it's responsible to its shareholders. Could you imagine how this would wreak havoc on the insurance industry if they started accepting all the kidney donors on individual health plans? The abuse would be rampant. There would be such a rash of kidney donations.... By making this issue public then BCBS may feel the public pressure to discover that there is a greater value in satisfying a sympathetic public than there is in the hit they'll take on the bad publicity. Why if BCBS were bold enough they could change their eligibility policy and spin it into one of those happy insurance ads like that clever "I'll do it tomorrow" commercial, but then that commercial was very depressing. Sometimes I think we are more valuable to them when classified and treated as sick and depressed. They must treat us this way because they would go out of business if they truly promoted health. Possibly some sort of Federal policy governing HMO's could be created? We are the government by the way. We could hire representatives to watch over them for us. What a novel idea. I'm glad I thought of it.
Very awesome!
Post a comment
Please be civil, brief and relevant.
E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Terms and Conditions before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.



