Commentary
Gambling expansion would increase peril for some Minnesota families
by Tom PrichardTom Prichard is president of the Minnesota Family Council.
Who should pay for a new Vikings stadium? Minnesotans with gambling problems and addictions?
It sounds preposterous, yet that's the effect of legislation seeking to fund a new Vikings stadium with a massive expansion of gambling. It would place tens of thousands of electronic pull-tabs and bingo machines in bars and restaurants throughout the state in order to underwrite the state's contribution to the stadium.
Doing so would be an enormous mistake for several reasons.
First, gambling tax proceeds are a notoriously unpredictable source of funding. Simply look at the fiscal analyses of the stadium/electronic gambling bills over the past year. They range from $50 million to $70 million in tax payments to the state. Predictions of gross gambling receipts range from $1.5 billion to $2.5 billion. Bars and restaurants using the electronic machines range from 2,500 to 3,500 sites, with 25,000 to 35,000 machines statewide.
Some question whether these revenue numbers are too optimistic. If the numbers are wrong, taxpayers could well be left holding the bag.
Second, expanding electronic pull-tab and bingo machines targets problem gamblers, because video or electronic gambling is the most addictive form of gambling. (Some call it the crack cocaine of gambling, because the gambling high compares to the high from crack cocaine.) No doubt that's a reason for the projected increase in gambling receipts. Studies of video slot machines in casinos find that a third to a half of video slot gambling revenues come from 1 percent of the gamblers. These are, of course, problem gamblers. Without compulsive gamblers, the reliance on expanding video or electronic gambling won't work.
Third, blanketing the state with tens of thousands of electronic gambling machines in thousands of bars and restaurants is like setting up mini-casinos in every corner of the state. Combining an addictive form of gambling with alcohol is a recipe for trouble. (The bill only allows for use of the machines in locations with liquor licenses or bingo halls.) This will only deepen indebtedness and addiction.
Fourth, it will lead to bigger government. It's estimated that 1 percent of the public is vulnerable to gambling addiction and problems. That's 50,000 Minnesotans. These Minnesotans have families and employers who will suffer the consequences of their gambling problems. Just ask the spouses or ex-spouses of problem gamblers. Such gambling breaks up marriages and families. And when families break up, more children are thrown into poverty, putting added burden on our social welfare system, which is called upon to pick up the pieces. It also increases crimes like embezzlement, theft, etc., which means more funds will be needed for public safety. Numerous studies show these costs far outweigh any benefits from the additional gambling.
Fifth, blanketing the state with electronic gambling further spreads the "get rich quick" message in our state. You don't have to save and work hard to get ahead. You can realize your dreams by gambling your money away. We're developing a gambling mentality with our finances and futures. According to a survey by the Consumer Federation of America, a full 20 percent of Americans think the best way to gain long-term financial security is by playing the lottery.
And finally, using an expansion of gambling for stadium funding means the state has a vested interest in turning more Minnesotans into gamblers. It's preying on the people it's supposed to be protecting. It's exploiting rather than protecting the people of Minnesota.
There are various ways for the state to pay for a new Vikings stadium. Turning more Minnesotans into problem gamblers shouldn't be one of them.
Comments (3)
It really bugs me when MPR refers to the proposed stadium issues as "Vikings stadium" when the Minnesota Vikings already have a stadium, Hubert Humphry Metrodome. By referring to this as "Vikings stadium", it is implying that this thing has already been built and been given away to the Minnesota Vikings.
Salient argument against the spread of gambling in general, and gambling in bars in particular. Unfortunately, this kind of thinking - the kind that pays attention to the long term effects on families and society - has long been abandoned thanks to industries that promote alcohol, sex, and gambling and to governments that have no problem profiting from tax money gained therefrom.
After the spread of those slot machines takes place, we are bound to see the deleterious effects you mention, but in all likelihood the blame will not be placed on the presence of the slot machines, but on other intractable, unmanageable problems like "awareness" and "education", which should be addressed but can never come close to solving problems on their own. Many solutions will be proposed to the emerging gambling epidemic, none of which will be to simply get rid of the slot machines. It will take many years of trying and failing while many families and children suffer.
Just look at the fact that alcohol kills more people statistically that all illegal drugs combined, then look a how nothing at all is done to give alcohol its worthy depiction as a dangerous substance. For decades we've been trying to say "you can drink, in moderation" while millions of families suffer the consequences of alcoholism. Will alcohol itself ever be to blame? Probably not.
Sad but true.
This idea that we can protect families from the evils of gambling by not allowing new forms of gambling is just so...1892ish.
That cow has left the barn, and she isn't coming back. Gambling is here and flourishing, in all its forms. The question is: Will Minnesota get the revenues from the gambling activities of Minnesotans, or will those monies go to Las Vegas, Atlantic City, and the Tribes?
Much better we open up ALL gambling to responsible businessmen all over the State so that Minnesota can keep the tax money and license fees right here, rather than send it to Nevada, New Jersey, and the Tribes.
The family will not be any the worse off for gambling being more out in the open. That's where it should be. Vices are much more destructive when forced underground by heavy handed Government interference with individual free will choice.
The State is NOT there to protect you from yourself. Make your mistakes and learn from them. You don't make gamblers by allowing them to gamble. The experience of losing their money cures most folks of the desire to get rich quick at the casino.
So, don't worry about it. We Minnesotans will be no worse off with more gambling in the State. But we will have more money in the State treasury, and less leaking to the Tribes, Vegas, etc.
Post a comment
Please be civil, brief and relevant.
E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Terms and Conditions before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
