Sample Blog Header

What concerns does the prospect of synthetic life raise for you?

Posted at 5:00 AM on May 24, 2010 by Eric Ringham (10 Comments)
Filed under: Religion/Ethics, Science/Technology

Genetic scientists say they have taken a big step toward the creation of synthetic life. Today's Question: What concerns does the prospect of synthetic life raise for you?


Comments (10)

Synthetic life scares the bejeebers out of me.

We didn't learn about unintended consequences from things like introducing non-native and invasive species into our environments?

We might think we can control what we create, but we've been proven wrong. We just don't have the necessary god-like perspective.

Posted by Mary | May 29, 2010 6:01 PM



I'm never afraid of anything that can be killed with fire or a bullet:-)
DTOM

Posted by James | May 24, 2010 4:30 PM


How long before "Blade Runner" becomes a reality? It's a long way out, but that would be quite troubling indeed.

Posted by Aaron | May 24, 2010 3:35 PM


Patenting.

Posted by Eliza | May 24, 2010 12:02 PM


The concern this raised for me is that life evolves. If we create an artificial genome, place it inside of an existing cell, and it controls that cell, it would begin its own evolutionary path if released into the environment. However it sounds like this is not entirely an artificial genome. It is a chemically created copy of an existing genome. That means it has millions of years of evolutionary history influencing its development. It does however have several genetically modified regions.

I'm not sure I'm even that concerned that they genetically engineered the chromosome. We've been doing that with bacterial plasmids for many years now safely with many benefits for humans. The bacterial chromosome may be about 1000 times larger than the plasmids, but we have the technology and regulations in place that I think would keep that safe. A chromosome seems much more complex to make. What advantages are there to manipulating an entire chromosome rather than single genes then inserted in plasmids that would make it worth the extra time and expense?

I'm disappointed that the media did not pick up on and emphasize that the original purpose for developing this techonolgy was to determine what genes are essential for life. (May 20, 2010 press conference http://www.jcvi.org/media/) Now that seems like a great question of pure science worth pursuing .

Posted by Kalli | May 24, 2010 9:39 AM


Patented GMOs have given big agribusiness new ways to profiteer from farmers. How much more will they be able to do so by patenting completely artificial life forms?

Posted by Steve the Cynic | May 24, 2010 9:22 AM


Definitely unintended consequences. Also the prospect of the technology falling into the wrong hands and being used for harm.

Posted by Amy | May 24, 2010 9:09 AM


I’m worried the US will choose to turn away from this technology due to fear and religion, while the rest of the world proceeds into the future.

Posted by Craig | May 24, 2010 9:00 AM


Synthetic death. I worry that we'll create unintended consequences.

Posted by Chad | May 24, 2010 8:43 AM


Unintended consequences.

Posted by Sue de Nim | May 24, 2010 6:25 AM


Post a comment

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>
Fields marked with * are required.


Comment Preview appears above this form upon pressing the "preview" button. Edit your comment and press "preview" again, until you are satisfied with your comment.

Your comment may not appear on the blog until several minutes after it was submitted.

May 2010
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          


Master Archive

Public Insight Network

The Public Insight Network draws upon your experiences to help shape our coverage.
More

MPR News
Radio

Listen Now

On Air

On Being

Other Radio Streams from MPR

Classical MPR
Radio Heartland

Services