MN Forward, a group backing business-friendly candidates, is airing a new ad attacking Mark Dayton's tax plan.
"Dayton will raise job killing taxes by $5 billion," says a voice over in the ad, which features wailing children clearly upset by Dayton's tax plan. "That's more than $2,300 in new taxes per Minnesota family."
Dry your tears, kids. These claims are false.
MN Forward spokesman Brian McClung points to an article written by Minnesota Public Radio's Tim Pugmire last June, when Dayton was still vying to win the DFL primary. At the time, Dayton hadn't released many details about his tax plan, only that he was going to raise taxes on the wealthiest Minnesotans and that he wanted to raise $5 billion to cover the state's deficit.
Since then, Dayton has changed his tax proposal because his first wouldn't have raised enough money. Now, Dayton wants to increase the income tax rate on the state's wealthiest to 10.95 percent, which will bring in about $1.9 billion over two years.
All told, Dayton plans to raise about $3.7 billion by raising taxes, closing corporate tax loopholes and building a state-owned casino at the Mall of America, and save about $1.2 billion by trimming government spending.
So, MN Forward is using old data to root its claim. But even if it was true, would it mean "more than $2,300 in new taxes per Minnesota family?"
McClung said MN Forward came up with that figure by dividing $5 billion by the more than 2.1 million households in the state. The math works out, but it's grossly misleading because it implies that every family would pay $2,300 in new taxes, which is false; Dayton's plan - past and present - only targets a sliver of the state's population.
The MN Forward ad uses old data to make false claims. It fails the PoliGraph test.
MN Forward, "Still Sad?", Oct. 2, 2010
Minnesota Public Radio News, DFL candidates for governor trade barbs over taxes, June 9, 2010
Mark Dayton for Governor, Taxes & Budget Plan, accessed Oct. 4, 2010
Minnesota Department of Administration, Minnesota population estimates: number and characteristics of the current population, accessed Oct. 5, 2010
Minnesota Department of Revenue, 2009 Tax Incidence Study, accessed Oct. 4, 2010
Interview, Brian McClung, Oct. 2, 2010
I think the PoliGRaph may want to do the math Dayton and reporters have so far refused.
I'll be posting something this evening to explain.
Tease: $20,000 tax increase per person if you only go after top 10% of earners in MN.
Jab: Dayton's trust funds are sheltered.
Stay tuned to www.residualforces.com for a better look at just how bad Dayton's plan is going to be for Minnesotans.
Does anyone really believe Dayton no longer plans to raise $5 billion in new tax revenue? Did he have a change of heart? Of course not - his math just didn't add up. This ad is perfectly fair.
@AAA@Billy, looks like the Emmer Total Fabrication Budget fooled you guys, too. The numbers that don't add up in this campaign are all in Tom Emmer's Total Fantasy Budget. Here are the real numbers Emmer pretends don't exist to create his Totally Phony Budget:
• $2.1 billion of federal stimulus money received and spent in the 2010 biennium, which will not be repeated in 2012.
• $1.9 billion in borrowing from our school districts in 2010
• $1.2 billion in built-in inflation in the 2012 biennium (calculated at about 1.9% per year)
• $1.0 billion in one time cuts in the 2010 budget, for programs which will have to be paid for, or cut again, in 2012
• $1.4 billion in 2012 required payback to school districts for 2010 borrowing
You can search in vain for any of these numbers in Tom Emmer's Completely Made Up No Relationship to Reality Budget. Happy hunting.