Posted at 4:00 PM on July 27, 2007
by Euan Kerr
Let me get an admission out of the way: despite the near carpet-bombing of Simpsons programs on certain TV channels over the years, I don't remember actually watching an entire episode.
This may explain why I enjoyed "The Simpsons Movie" so much. It's an 84 minute rush of one-liners, slapstick, and cultural gut-punching. It makes you laugh out loud, and in my case I have been singing the obnoxious 'Spiderpig" song to myself for hours.
The script throws so many twists at the audience that at the screening where I saw it, when the film broke down, most of the audience thought it was part of the show. It was only after the delay stretched into a couple of minutes and someone went rushing out of the theater that people realized what was up.
So that's the fun stuff. But this movie could set a worrying precedent. Try as they might, Hollywood has a pretty poor record at successfully transferring TV shows to the big screen. Half hour sitcoms have the narrative tensile strength of a wet tissue and so can't bear the weight of a full movie treatment.
But "The Simpsons Movie" is likely to make money, and the movie even concludes with what amounts to a declaration there will be a sequel.
A report on Marketplace last night predicted that Hollywood will be inspired to throw a lot more shows into film production, which won't be pretty. Two hours of "That 70's Show?" or 90 minutes of "Two and a Half Men?"
We have been warned.
| July 2007 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||