Forest Fire on the Gunflint Trail leads to discovery of further evidence for an ancient, giant meteorite impact at Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

 

By Paul Weiblen

May 16, 2007

 

It will be small comfort for those whose property was consumed by the Ham Lake fire to learn that in the matter of a few minutes some 1, 850 million years ago the entire Gunflint region suffered a far greater catastrophe.  But, bad things happen on the good planet Earth and the Ham Lake forest fire that left an ugly, scorched footprint in the beautiful Gunflint region is certainly one of them.  Still, it is nothing compared to the devastation wrought by a meteorite, probably over five miles in diameter that struck the earth at Sudbury, Ontario.  The impact scattered a blanket of debris from a crater, presumed to be 160 miles in diameter, over nearly a million square miles - much as the eruption of Mount Vesuvius buried Pompeii.  Just as there are benefits from fires in forests, the Sudbury Impact Event is just one of the many geologic processes that produced the scenic wonders of North America.

 

Minnesota Geological Survey geologist, Mark Jirsa and University of Minnesota Geology Professor Emeritus Paul Weiblen were scheduled to lead a geology field trip at the end of the Gunflint Trail on Saturday, May 12th.  The trip was part of the annual meeting of the Institute of Lake Superior Geology (ILSG), held during the week at the Lutsen Resort on Lake Superior.  As the fire grew from 17,000 to nearly 75,000 acres (117 square miles), the trip was of course cancelled.  However, on May 8th, Jirsa was still able to visit one of the planned field trip stops in the vicinity of the Gunflint Lodge.  During his examination of rock exposures at the stop, he discovered some unusual features in the rocks at the top of the Gunflint Iron Formation.  Jirsa was able to show samples of the rocks to William Addison, a colleague attending the ILSG meeting.  Addison recognized immediately that the samples exhibit the typical textures of material that is ejected from a meteorite crater and deposited over a large area around the crater (somewhat like volcanic ash around an erupting volcano).

 

Over the past two decades, geologists have reached a consensus that a large meteorite impact occurred at Sudbury Ontario, 1,850 million years ago. This is also considered to be the time when the formation of a succession of iron-rich sedimentary rocks in a shallow ocean basin in northeastern Minnesota and southern Ontario was coming to an end. The impact created a large, 162 mile-diameter crater, like those still visible on the Moon and other terrestrial planets.  From studies of lunar craters and model calculations, impacts of this magnitude produce "blankets" of ejected material over an area as much as five times the radius of the crater.  On the Moon, the ejecta blankets have been relatively easy to identify because the only active geologic processes have been successive cratering, deposition of ejecta blankets, and in-filling of the cratered terrane on the front side of the Moon with lunar lava.  Thus, the geology of the Moon is relatively simple, consisting only of an ancient cratered terrane (the bright reflective highlands), the lava infilling (the dark maria forming the Man in the Moon), and the succession of lunar ejecta blankets that have remained undisturbed over geologic time.   By contrast, impact ejecta deposits on Earth are only a minor component in the very complex succession of igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks that make up our continents.  Hence solely from a consideration of abundance, it is not surprising that impact ejecta have not been readily recognized by geologists. In addition, it is not clear what the effects of Earth's atmosphere and hydrosphere were on the alteration and preservation of impact ejecta.

 

The complex products of impact  range from angular fragments of preexisting rocks and partially melted, recrystallized, or glassy fragments, to spherules that condense from vapor in the ejecta cloud (much like hail stones form in rain clouds).  The shock wave produced by impact transports ejecta away from the site of impact at velocities of miles per second. On Earth the shock wave would produce giant tsunamis.  The force of the currents on the bottom of shallow ocean basins would disrupt the layering and other features of sediments accumulating on the sea floor and probably even some of the sea floor itself.  The layer of sediment that would accumulate after the tsunami had passed would be a very complex mixture of disrupted sediments and the ejecta material. Oxidation and hydration would further alter impact ejecta.  Only a handful of geologists have tackled the difficult problem of recognizing and positively identifying the presumably meager trace of impact ejecta in rock exposures around the world.   Addison and a fellow high school science teacher, Gregory Brumpton, driven by curiosity and the belief that ejecta from the Sudbury impact must exist, began a search about 15 years ago in the Thunder Bay area.  They were aided and encouraged by the recognition in Australia of unusual rocks with some of the characteristics of ejecta materials described above.  Addison and  Brumpton focused their search on exposures of Gunflint Iron Formation  in the vicinity of  Thunder Bay. Ironically, at Hillcrest Park in Thunder Bay, where Addison played as a child, they found a ten to twenty foot-thick layer at the top of the Gunflint Iron Formation that fits the now accepted criteria for impact ejecta transported and deposited in a tsunami surge.  This exposure had been described and dismissed by earlier geologists as a "chaotic mess" at the top of the Gunflint Iron Formation.

 

Building on and expanding Addison's and Brumpton's search for remnants of the elusive Sudbury Impact ejecta blanket, William Cannon of the United States Geological Survey has found and documented exposures of the ejecta blanket in or near five of the iron ranges in the Lake Superior region in Ontario, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota (see map below).

Jirsa's discovery adds an occurrence in the Gunflint Iron Formation just off the Gunflint Trail.

 

The significance of Jirsa's find and the other occurrences of the Sudbury Impact ejecta blanket is that a unique layer of rock formed over an area more than 400 miles from Sudbury in the matter of a few days or less, 1,850 million years ago.  As Cannon points out, the layer is a "time line" that defines a precise moment in time for the rocks with which it is interbedded. In addition, some of the interbedded rocks contain fossil remains of cyanobacteria, the earliest preserved forms of life on earth.  Excellent examples of these fossil remains, called stromatolites are well exposed in the upper layers of the Gunflint Iron Formation at the field trip stop off the Gunflint Trail where Jirsa found the ejecta layer. 

 

There is a major world-wide concentration of iron-formations of the same age as the Gunflint Iron Formation.  The reason for this is generally thought to be related to the build up of oxygen in the atmosphere by photosynthesis. At low levels of oxygen, iron would have been soluble in the early oceans, but at high levels the dissolved iron was oxidized and highly insoluble. This would result in the precipitation of iron and its incorporation into sedimentary rocks forming at the time.  Cyanobacteria played a crucial role in the oxygen build up and the origin of  iron-formations.  William Canon of the USGS has noted that the occurrence of iron-formations world-wide decreases precipitously around 1, 850 million years ago. Since this is also the date of the Sudbury Impact, Cannon has raised the question of whether the impact had world-wide consequences, the principal one being the extinction of cyanobacteria, which would have abruptly ended the favorable conditions for formation of iron-rich sedimentary rocks. 

 

Further documentation of the Sudbury Impact and its effects on geologic processes at the time will be an increasingly exciting area of research.  But it is really only the beginning of exciting research for geologists interested in the early history of the Earth.  The record of meteorite impact on the Moon shows that the size and intensity of impact decreased over time. The craters that define the "Man on the Moon" were created by giant impacts around 4,000 million years ago.  After that time the impact rate and size decreased to only sporadic impacts after about 2,500 million years.  Thus the effects of impact on terrestrial geologic processes before 2,500 million years ago should be even more dramatic than those associated with the Sudbury Impact. Only one older and larger impact than Sudbury has been documented on Earth.  It is the Vredefort structure in South Africa, dated at 2,500 million years.  Products of the impact like the Sudbury ejecta blanket remain to be discovered and documented. It is unfortunate that as the impact rate increases with age on Earth, other geologic processes have had a longer time to obscure the record of impact. The oldest rocks in North America, dating back to at least 3,800 million years are found in the Minnesota River Valley in southwestern Minnesota.  Unfortunately it has been demonstrated that these rocks have undergone four periods of burial, deformation, metamorphism, and uplift.  Professor Emeritus Paul Weiblen has puzzled over the question of what was the fate of the impact products during the processes that formed the ancient rocks now exposed in the Minnesota River Valley.  Weiblen concludes that a sure way of "proving" that the impact record has been totally obliterated is not to look for it.  It is interesting to note that it took two high school science teachers not professional geologists to discover the rocks that record the effects of the Sudbury Impact.

 

Approximate locations of Sudbury Impact Layer Sites and the Sudbury Impact

Map from Cannon, W.F. and Addison, W.D., 2007, The Sudbury Impact Layer in the

Lake Superior Iron Ranges: A Time-Line from the Heavens, Institute of Lake Superior

Geology, 53rd Annual Meeting, May 8-13, 2007, Lutsen, Minnesota, v. 53, Part 1

Proceedings and Abstracts, p. 20-21.  Locality of impact ejecta in Minnesota shown by star.

 

 

 

 

NEXT TO DO

Paul analyzes samples

Get TS of carbonate breccia from stop 8b

Map out tsunami deposits