Commentary
It's a mistake to start down the path of killing wolves again
By Howard Goldman
Howard Goldman is Minnesota state director of the Humane Society of the United States.
The Minnesota wolf hunt begins this coming Saturday. Four hundred wolves will be killed.
This is the same wolf that just came off the endangered species list. The same wolf that was shot, poisoned and trapped almost out of existence.
My organization, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), will be challenging the delisting in federal court. On Oct. 15 HSUS gave formal notice of our intent to sue to restore federal protections to the wolf populations here, in Wisconsin and in Michigan.
I represented HSUS at earlier delisting hearings in Grand Rapids, Minn., and Ashland, Wis. Wolves occupy only 5 percent of their historic range; they have not recovered.
Why was a wolf season even considered in Minnesota? Not for food; we don't eat wolves. Not to control the population; it has been stable since 1998. There was only one reason: recreational killing for trophies.
Let me say again, there is no biological reason to kill wolves.
Wolves are a public trust. They don't belong to hunters and trappers. They belong to all the citizens of the state, and over 75 percent of them oppose the season. That was the result of the only public survey conducted in Minnesota. It wasn't even our survey; it was the state Department of Natural Resources survey.
There are adequate protections for ranchers. If wolves prey on farm animals, they are killed by USDA- and DNR-certified trappers. So far this year, 266 wolves have thus been killed. And farmers receive market rate compensation for animals lost to wolves.
The hunting community and the Department of Natural Resources like to talk about a wolf "harvest." Wrong word. Wolves are not stalks of corn. They are living symbols of wilderness, and highly intelligent and complex social animals. And we are told the harvest will be "only" 400 wolves. It is really closer to 1,000 that will perish, when you consider all the sources of human-caused mortality — including poaching and those killed because of livestock depredations. This totals more than one-third of the state's estimated wolf population. Many scientists believe that a kill of more than 30 percent is the tipping point, where wolf numbers might decline significantly.
Let's not go down that path again.
We wouldn't shoot eagles, even if we could. We have a special relationship with wolves as well. I recently returned from Duluth, where a native organization, the Northwoods Alliance, sponsored a wolf walk. Members of the alliance believe that during the time of creation, the wolf and the Anishinaabe (original man) walked the earth together. Their Creator said, "You are to have separate paths. You must go different ways. What shall happen to one of you will also happen to the other." We have much to learn from the Anishinaabe. Wolves deserve to be protected.
Coming tomorrow: a contrary view.
Comments (7)
This is a test submission...
Well said.
Trapping especially is a very disturbing way to "manage" anything.
You said it, recreational killing. I've been looking at the Minnesota and Wisconsin Wolf Hunting websites and I think it goes a little beyond recreation.
We need to realize that killing a wolf is not the same as a deer. Wolves live in complex families. As we know, the death of a family member, especially the alpha (head of household) creates tremendous turmoil in the social/family group, possibly leading to predation of animals more easily taken down. Through wolf hunting, we may very well exacerbate the problem we think we are solving.
Thank you. Well said. I am absolutely sickened by the photos of wolves killed in today's Star Tribune. What right do hunters have to kill this beautiful creature that is an integral part of the ecosystem? To kill a mother or a father of a family? Is that really okay? And for sport? It is abominable. It breaks my heart. It MUST be stopped!
Thank you for writing this. I'm sickened every time I hear about hunters killing wolves. It was terrible to see the hunters posing with their "trophies" on the front of the newspaper. How awful.
Hat's off to Howard Goldman and Dr. Maureen Hackett and all of us who support Howling For Wolves. One of the keys is educating the public to the misconceptions surrrounding the wolf who has been demonized and persecuted and used as a scapegoat for centuries... There is no such thing as that wolf who grabs children from yards or goes on a killing spree--only humans are capable of that. Instead, the monogamous, socialy complex wolf is timid and simply wants his place to raise his family by blending into what is left of our wilderness... He is a much needed apex predator who deserves federal protection for all time. He should be cherished for the role he plays in maintaining a healthy ecosystem, not disrespected in unconceivable ways. I am sure that the people who demonize wolves today are direct descendants of those who long ago thought the world was flat--it is the same atavistic mentality born from simple lack of knowledge... SAVE ME SEE ME...
Post a comment
Please be civil, brief and relevant.
E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Terms and Conditions before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
