Photo: #Hani Hamdan: It is outrageous that in the modern world one population can simply replace another.

Commentary

A view of Palestine question you may not have heard: the Palestinian one

by Hani Hamdan

Hani Hamdan lives in Burnsville and practices dentistry in Lakeville, Minn. He is a contributor and editor of Engagemn.com and a source in MPR News' Public Insight Network.

Anyone who followed international soccer news might have come across the story of Mahmoud Sarsak, a Palestinian player who went on a hunger strike in an Israeli prison. The Israelis were holding him without charge or due process.

Sarsak has been held for three years on suspicion of being involved with Islamic Jihad, a charge he denies, and had been on hunger strike for three months. Now Israel has agreed to release him this summer, and Sarsak has begun eating again.

To many Americans, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a tedious and frustrating affair to which there seems to be no solution.

Unfortunately, Sarsak's story is part of a Palestinian narrative that is all but completely ignored in U.S. media, which is unfair to Americans since they are heavily invested in the conflict with billions of tax dollars in addition to American military and diplomatic efforts in the region. So I'd like to describe what goes through a Palestinian person's mind when thinking about the Palestine problem.

May 14th marked the anniversary of Israel's establishment as a state in 1948. For Israel's supporters, it was a day to celebrate. However, for the many millions of Palestinians and Arabs worldwide, the feeling is far from celebratory. In Arabic-speaking countries, it's called the day of Nakbah, which means calamity, tragedy or travesty.

Imagine how you'd feel if one day someone forcefully removed you from your house and farm and turned you and your family into penniless refugees because that person's ancestors, 3,000 years ago, used to live on your land. To Palestinians, that's the whole crux of the matter: An entire population was removed from its home country and its homes and farms were simply confiscated. To them, it is particularly outrageous that in the modern world one population can simply replace another.

Contrary to what many in the West believe, the root of the Palestinian side of the struggle is not a religious one. Palestinians would be just as unhappy if their occupiers were Russian Jews or Moroccan Muslims. The conflict, to Palestinians, is about land and justice, first and foremost.

Some would feel comfortable believing that Palestinians were like Bedouins or wandering tribes with no attachment to their land, but the truth is far from that. The land between the river Jordan and the Mediterranean sea was robust with cities, factories and farmland owned and registered to Palestinian Arab owners. I know this first hand, because both of my parents' families still hold onto their land ownership certificates.

My father's family grew crops in a village called Um Khalid, now part of the Israeli city of Natanya. My mother's family grew fruit trees in the village of Salamah. Hundreds of oil presses, brick factories, soap factories, jewelry workshops, printing presses, flour mills and fabric factories, to name a few, burgeoned in Palestine, mostly owned and operated by Palestinian Arabs.

If you talk to an elderly Palestinian in the refugee camps of Jordan or Lebanon, you're sure to hear stories about where they grew up in Palestine, where they went to school, about the cinema in the city, the farms and groves, and how it's all gone now.

That land was a beacon of knowledge. Palestinian refugees, well educated in Palestinian schools before exile, were instrumental in the building of young countries like Kuwait and Jordan after their independence. As far back as the 10th century, Palestine gave birth to prominent Arab scholars, intellectuals, poets and politicians.

You might say that Jews were there before anyone else, so they deserve to reclaim their historical homeland. Palestinians, however, have a broader historical perspective. They know that even before prophet Abraham, Palestine was ruled at various times by the Babylonians, the Phoenicians, the Canaanites, the Philistines, the Assyrians, the Egyptians, the Greeks and the Romans, all of whom left their cultural and genetic marks on Palestine. To Palestinians, Palestine never belonged to a single race, as Palestinians themselves are a genetic hodgepodge collectively called "Arabs" for simplicity and because they speak Arabic. The argument that Jews own Palestine because their ancestors ruled it for a period of time is like saying that England belongs to the Vikings.

Unfortunately, like many political issues in the United States, the Palestinian problem was incorporated into the liberal/conservative chasm — historical facts have become irrelevant. Liberals view the issue as an oppressed people living under racial and religious discrimination, while conservatives go as far as dismissing the existence of Palestinians altogether. To Palestinians, the issue is much simpler: a grave, brazen injustice that has yet to be corrected.

Again, my goal is not to influence anyone's political views as much as to provide the Palestinian point of view, to let the reader see where Palestinians come from. People deserve to be informed of all perspectives.

Comments (6)

But who cares.... Any sane politician or man of repute and authority can hardly say anything regarding fareplay because of jews lobby in US.

Posted by zulfi ahmed from vizag | June 20, 2012 6:00 AM


Why don`t you mention the fact that most of the jews occupying Palestine cannot trace their background to that region because they are Ashkenaze jews, decsendants of eastern European converted jews. They have no right to be there and they ARE NOT SEMITIC.

Posted by Hugo Sumner | June 20, 2012 7:33 AM


Awesome article. It touched my heart.
Good job

Posted by Hassan Ismail from MN | June 20, 2012 10:22 AM


Great article, to the point, and absolutely true!

Posted by Guss Zeidan from Mississauga, ON | June 20, 2012 10:45 PM


Thank you so much for this article. Clear, concise and unbiased.

Posted by Charity Clayton from UK | June 21, 2012 2:01 AM


1. You could have had your own state if you had accepted the Peel Recommendations in 1937 or the UN Partition Plan in 1947.
2. You could have celebrated the creation of your own state between 1948-1967 after you had driven out all the Jews living in Gaza,the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
3. You could have had your own state if you had accepted the offers made by Israel in 2000 and 2008.
4. To say that "an entire population was removed from its home country" is simply untrue. How come 1.2 million Palestinian Arabs live in Israel today?
5. If both your parents families hold on to land ownership certificates they are entitled to be compensated by applying to the Custodian for Absentee Properties in Israel.
Regrettably it has always been all or nothing so far as you are concerned. This mindset has never changed and it appears that it is set to continue. That is the real Nakba.

Posted by David Singer | June 21, 2012 11:30 PM


Post a comment

Please be civil, brief and relevant.

E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Terms and Conditions before posting.

Inform our coverage and become a source in the Public Insight Network.

* indicates required field

*
*
*
 

characters remaining!"

You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.