Photo: #Tom Horner, former partner in the public relations firm of Himle Horner Inc. and former political analyst for MPR News, was the Independence Party candidate for governor of Minnesota in November 2010.

Commentary

Deal to end shutdown offers mediocrity clothed as compromise

by Tom Horner

Minnesotans are being offered a state of mediocrity. Put it in the clothes of compromise, of ending the very real pain that is being inflicted on people and businesses or even on the politicians' instinct to save their skins, the deals being bandied about by Gov. Mark Dayton and Republican leaders are sacrificing the state's long-term future for short-term solutions.

Enough is enough. It's time for policymakers on the left and the right to face the reality of a state in economic crisis. That was the call to action two years ago by the Budget Trends Commission.

"Today, the economy is weaker and the state's fiscal problems have grown more apparent," said the commission's report. "If Minnesota wishes to have the prosperity it had in past decades, the solutions will need to be robust, effective and immediate."

The commission wasn't from a lefty think tank, but a bipartisan group co-chaired by a former GOP legislator and Cabinet member in the administration of former Gov. Tim Pawlenty. Its findings paralleled the conclusions of the 21st Century Tax Reform Commission, a business-led, Pawlenty-appointed group that rejected the simplistic "no new taxes" philosophy.

In its 2009 report, it said that Minnesota's "outdated tax system hinders growth in the 21st-century knowledge-based economy, with its increasingly global markets for investment capital and labor..."

To be sure, Dayton is trying to end the budget stalemate that has been painful and harmful to many. But this is not the time to revert to stopgap measures and proposals that further mortgage Minnesota's future. This is the time for boldness.

Breaking the gridlock will require a third option that goes beyond holding the line on spending or generating more revenue from taxpayers. That option is Minnesota's future prosperity.

Dayton should lead the call to solve the current budget dilemma in the context of a long-term plan for prosperity. Create a two-year budget that is the first step in a 10-year plan of redesign and innovation.

The governor is offering ill-conceived concessions at just the time when the window was cracked open for a bold call to action. No doubt, Dayton faced the reality of Republican leaders and party bosses being able to hold their members in line on the narrow issue of a $34 billion budget in the current biennium. But more and more of today's Republicans are showing a willingness to go beyond GOP talking points if the focus is on the future.

Republican legislators like Red Wing's Sen. John Howe recognize that short-term thinking won't produce long-term policy reform. In a recent opinion article, Howe wrote, "Whether Republicans are able to hold the line at a $34 billion budget, or the governor finds a way to generate more money from the taxpayers, Minnesota will still be left with a broken, unreliable fiscal system, and we'll be right back here in two years having the same battle."

Gov. Dayton should build the future on the principles he holds in common with some Republican legislators and their traditional allies. This isn't a pie-in-the-sky, can't-we-all-get-along pitch for comity, but a reminder that this governor and this Legislature started the session with agreement on two deeply partisan and long-contentious issues.

They brokered important deals to create alternative teacher licensure that will bring new expertise to Minnesota's classrooms, and to streamline a permitting process to remove unnecessary regulations on businesses. In these areas, they shared the principles that students need to have access to practical, state-of-the-art information, especially in technical areas, and that Minnesota needs to be a less costly place in which to do business.

What are the principles that ought to guide our leaders from here on? Government programs need to be redesigned, not just made cheaper. A tax system should be fair, reliable and understandable. Minnesota businesses need the resources to invest in innovation and job creation.

A long-term outlook gives everyone the space they need to stay true to their core principles, while implementing the innovative solutions that will restore Minnesota's economic vitality.

Minnesota needs new approaches to tax policy, health, higher education and economic development, especially in smaller communities. But the reality is that good solutions take time and, in some cases, new money.

If Republicans truly want government to "live within its means," take the long view. If Dayton really wants a tax system that is fair, sustainable and generates the revenue needed for a Minnesota that holds opportunity for everyone, demand a plan that goes beyond the immediate crisis.

And if we Minnesotans want an end to the gridlock that is devastating to so many people and businesses, now is the time for us to demand the kind of bold, innovative policies and leadership that will keep Minnesota a state of prosperity.

----

Tom Horner, a former public relations executive and MPR News political analyst, was the Independence Party candidate for governor of Minnesota in 2010.

Comments (9)

We should not look for people that are willing to run on those thoughts. Look to the future. Maybe for now this new deal can work for the shorterm but we do need a long term view. Something I have said years ago and even former Gov. Ventura said the same thing. Next election I am looking for people that will think the long term not just a 2 year term and their next election. I agree, don't cut unless it doesn't work. There are options out there and we don't hear of them because the Dems and Reps keep them down. Time for a 3rd party to step up and give their say.

Posted by frederick L. tuttle from chesterfield, MO | July 14, 2011 3:06 PM


This is why Horner should have been elected governor. The DFL and GOP at least need to agree on guiding principles for Minnesota's economic future. It might help them realize that they have more in common than political rhetoric would suggest. If a stopgap measure is needed to open up that discussion, we might have to hold our noses and jump in before the shutdown situation becomes truly critical.

Posted by Michael Paine from Seattle, WA | July 14, 2011 3:12 PM


It makes me sick to hear news stories about our elected representatives failing to do their jobs, then hearing about the Marine who just died in Afghanistan. The two Legacy Parties are clearly broken-- fundamentally and permanently broken-- and I don't want to see this state brought down with those two sinking ships. Tom Horner is right, it is time for Minnesota to embrace a 3rd option. At this point it's the only real option anyway.

Posted by Kathryn VanBuskirk from North Mankato | July 14, 2011 3:27 PM


Here's a suggestion for raising funds. Allow all property owners in Minnesota the opportunity to buy the mineral rights to their property. The resulting revenue could either go into the state's general fund or directly to the county in which the property is located.

Posted by Robert Elgin from University City, MO | July 14, 2011 4:18 PM


Mr Horner understands what is needed. The extremes will fight his ideas with half truths and fears. If the left would embrace his economic concepts they would roll.

Posted by kristina Linson from St. Louis, MO | July 14, 2011 5:50 PM


This commentary is just more of the same from Tom Horner. It completely (but predictably) ignores reality. The GOP in this country have essentially become political and economic terrorists. Horner totally ignores the fact that they are not interested in serving people; they serve only their corporate and high-donor overlords. I am not at all pleased that Mark Dayton had to cave to the Republicans. But he really had no choice. Either he caves or the state remains shut down. Either way, the GOP wins.

The overarching question is, how do you negotiate with terrorists who want to kill their hostage?

One of the most satisfying things about Dayton's victory was an end to Tom Horner's extreme self-righteousness and smugness. Obviously that was a premature ending.

Posted by Richard Hardgrave from Deerfield, IL | July 14, 2011 6:02 PM


Will this GOP budget affect our state's credit rating? They have essentially taken out more loans to pay for Pawlenty's $5 billion debt rather than find revenue to pay for it now. Won't that be alot more expensive in the long run? Also how will it affect property taxes that skyrocketed under Pawlenty's false "no new taxes" doctrine.

Posted by Peggy Martin from Pasadena, CA | July 15, 2011 9:21 AM


So what changes are to be made?? Lots of talk but no real information!!!

Posted by Scott Mason from Fife, WA | July 15, 2011 1:23 PM


The worst of all solutions. After a 2-week shutdown the best they can come up with is to further stiff the schools and borrow more money. This is the same as borrowing money to pay off the credit cards. Are you kidding me! This is designed to cover their political backsides. Don't confuse this with governing.

Posted by Brian Johnson from lafayette, CO | July 15, 2011 5:17 PM


Post a comment

Please be civil, brief and relevant.

E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Terms and Conditions before posting.

Inform our coverage and become a source in the Public Insight Network.

* indicates required field

*
*
*
 

characters remaining!"

You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.