Commentary
If Vikings stadium is such a good idea, build it with private funds
by John MartyNo politician will admit to thinking that funds for a Vikings stadium are a top priority. But for some, it seems to rate higher than education, health care or other needs.
Thirty-seven out of 37 Republican state senators — every one of them — sent a letter to Gov. Mark Dayton earlier this year, strongly opposing any new taxes or revenues. They made their position clear — no taxes for schools or for health care. No taxes for roads and bridges, or for public safety, or for the environment. No new taxes for anything.
However, some of those Republican senators are making an exception. They recently introduced legislation to raise taxes to subsidize a new Vikings stadium.
The one thing for which they are willing to raise taxes is a taxpayer-subsidized stadium?
A Vikings stadium subsidy is not something the voters want. A Minnesota Poll conducted last October showed that voters, by an overwhelming 75 to 21 percent margin, reject using taxes for a stadium. Even among Republican voters, fewer than one in four support taxes for a stadium.
Politicians supporting the stadium subsidy claim they don't have a choice: If we don't subsidize a stadium, the Vikings will move. But Vikings owner Zygi Wilf has said, "From Day 1 ... I have promised that I would keep the team here in Minnesota forever." When asked if his commitment holds even if he does not get a new stadium, he reiterated, "Yes, I've stated that from Day 1."
If politicians are willing to put millions of tax dollars into a stadium because they believe Wilf doesn't mean what he says, they should provide evidence to support that belief. I have not seen anything to suggest that Wilf is other than a man of his word. In fact, he has gone out of his way to stress that his integrity: "My most important thing, is having my family's integrity. ... All I can tell you is this, that I live by my commitment."
There is even talk that a Vikings stadium could be dealt with before the budget deficit is addressed. Without any evidence that Wilf is being dishonest about his commitment to Minnesota, and with overwhelming public opposition to a stadium subsidy, why make it such a priority?
Some DFL politicians support a stadium subsidy because it will create jobs in the hard-hit construction industry. We urgently need more construction jobs, but we could get them by addressing the enormous backlog of public infrastructure needs. For example, within a few miles of the Metrodome, there are schools that were built in the 1930s and '40s that haven't been updated in decades. The deferred maintenance list is huge. By focusing on school buildings, we could create construction jobs and give our children the quality of school facilities they deserve, also saving money through energy efficiency improvements.
If the governor and legislative leaders sat down with Zygi Wilf and other business leaders, they could do what the Carolina Panthers did: build an NFL stadium with private funds. A stadium built with private funds would create just as many construction jobs as one built with taxpayer money, and would allow public funds to be used for sorely needed public infrastructure.
One final note. The amount of money we are talking about is not insignificant. To put the issue into terms that we can relate to, the Vikings want taxpayers to subsidize each of the 64,000 seats at every Vikings home game to the tune of more than $45 for each ticket, at every game — including preseason ones — for 30 years. Add a roof, and the subsidy jumps to $65 for every seat.
It is incredible that some politicians make this a top priority when the state budget is in crisis. The voters are right. A Vikings stadium subsidy shouldn't even be on the agenda.
Let's fix the state budget and address the huge challenges facing the state. And if they still want to help the Vikings, state leaders can sit down with business leaders and Zygi Wilf and develop a private funding plan.
----
Sen. John Marty, DFL-Roseville, is serving his eighth term in the Minnesota Legislature.
Comments (11)
Well said, Senator!
I want my tax money to go to the common good, not to a Vikings stadium.
You can raise my taxes but not for a professional sports facility. And don't be mistaken, sales tax is a tax.
If you don't want to raise taxes, this is one place we agree.
THANK YOU, Sen. Marty! I couldn't say it any better.
Dear Senator,
The state money should be spent according to projects that have a higher priority. I see money spent on state parks that promote healthy living and creative thinking. I see the Viking's stadium promotes unhealthy eating, drinking and inactive living. Please spend the state money in ways that enhance the mental and physical health of the people of this state.
Thank you Senator Marty! Very well said. This stadium deal is an outrage. Please keep fighting hard against it.
I find myself rarely agreeing with rep Marty's political position, however this time he seems to have read the polls correctly, a Vikings stadium bill will destroy any residual trust the people have for the party in power.
Though I strongly disagree with the democrat position of holding our children random, continually asserting there is never enough we can spend on teachers benefits, school administration, football fields, hockey rinks, basketball arenas, bleachers, and theatre for our children (none of which benefited me as a student of st paul public schools, destined for college, but only hindered me) I wholly agree there is no real need that we Minnesotans should continue to subsidize this very profitable consortium of highly recompenced athletes, the Vikings
Does the same go for Minnesota Public Radio? I'm a proud member that would like this wonderful service to divorce itself of government funding. I don't support subsidizing either of these. Let the users pay, or let them go a way.
At last, something on which Senator Marty and I agree. My only critique of his position is that he doesn't extend it far enough, to all venues of government sponsored entertainment. If enterprises such as orchestras, theaters , convention centers, zoos, television and radio stations can't keep their doors open through sale of their services to the public, they have no reason to exist.
DFLer Marty doesn't say which Republicans favor this boondoggle and frankly, I'd like to know. I'm a Republican and at our last State Central Committee meeting, we passed a resolution opposing spending taxpayer money for a sports stadium. Congratulations to Senator Marty for getting onto the same page. Now, who are those rascals looking for seats on the 50-yard line. We'd like to know because we have to find some conservatives to replace them in 2012.
Ed. Note: David Allan Pundt is the Deputy Chair of the Crow Wing County Republicans and was a District 12A State Representative candidate in 2008.
Ted, there are commercial theaters: Chanhassen Dinner Theatres, Broadway. How do they survive? By putting on revivals of "Oklahoma" and charging an arm and a leg. If you believe the arts, among other things, should be available to more than the elite, to people of more modest means, or none at all, welcome to the concept of nonprofits.
As an independent voter, I vote for the individual who I think best represents the voters of MN; not those of special interest groups or those looking to benefit themselves. Hence, I think the Stadium should be built with private funds - not tapayers dollars. And if the State wants to create permanent jobs while increasing its revenue; maybe the State should build, own & operate a casino. Hence the State would create Construction & Permanent jobs with additional tax revenue coming in year after year! And the residents of Ramsey County should have a vote on this tax raising issue. chow
Post a comment
Please be civil, brief and relevant.
E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Terms and Conditions before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
