Photo: #Monte Bute is a professor of sociology and social science at Metropolitan State University. This article is adapted from testimony before the Minnesota House and Senate higher education committees.

Commentary

Those of us who were helped by Minnesota's higher ed system must help preserve it

by Monte Bute

My days are numbered. I am battling a rare and terminal cancer. That harsh reality forces me to reflect upon my life.

I grew up a farm boy in southwestern Minnesota. My parents struggled to eke out a living on an 80-acre farm. Their education was limited and college was not on our radar screen. Given that background, how did I become a university professor?

Put simply, I had access to high quality and reasonably priced public education. If today's political climate had prevailed then, it is unlikely that I would have taken those tentative first steps at a local junior college.

As the governor and Legislature grapple with the state's budget deficit, they and other interested parties will defend their own interests. That's as it should be in the legislative process. However, a greater good must ultimately transcend each of our narrow interests.

We operate in an environment where starkly polarized opinions dominate policy discussions. However, there is unanimity on one issue. From the Minnesota Business Partnership and the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce to the AFL-CIO and the Citizens League, there is consensus that the key to prosperity and well-being for the state of Minnesota and its citizens is an educated workforce.

A Georgetown University study projects that by 2018, 70 percent of Minnesota's new job openings will require postsecondary education. Today only 48 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds have an associate degree or higher. We must close that gap. Yet at a time when we should be increasing our investment in future workforce needs, the state is cutting appropriations, thus making college less accessible and affordable. Both the House and the Senate have approved substantial cuts to the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU) system and to the University of Minnesota.

Higher education was once considered a public good, like transportation and public safety. From 1960 to 2001, governors and Legislatures treated it as such. Unfortunately, during the last decade we have abandoned that heritage. Gov. Tim Pawlenty and successive Legislatures began treating higher education as a private good. Substituting student loans and grants for state appropriations has been a cruel shell game for the current generation of students.

Through most of the 1980s, the state's share of public higher education was still 80 percent, with students picking up the other 20 percent. In the 1990s, the state share was down to roughly two-thirds of the cost. Today the state's commitment to sharing college expenses has shrunk to 43 percent. Consequently, a tuition tsunami has swamped public college students and their families. During the last decade, tuition has more than doubled. It would rise still further under the bills passed this week by the House and Senate.

MnSCU students are likely to come from modest means. They are frequently the first in their families to attend college. These students work far too many hours, take more credits than they can handle and, given the state's tuition policy, end up with debt that seems as insurmountable as that of the federal government.

If cuts are unavoidable, I ask that they be kept modest. In Minnesota, quality education should not be a private good, limited to the well-to-do or those willing to mortgage their futures with jumbo-sized student loans.

The visionary political leaders of the 1960s and 1970s made long-term investments in my generation's public higher education that continue to pay high dividends for Minnesota. We should do the same for our children and our children's children.

--

Monte Bute is a professor of sociology and social science at Metropolitan State University. This article is adapted from testimony before the Minnesota House and Senate higher education committees.

Comments (4)

I am 100% in supportive with Professor Monte Bute's testimony. I like to urge our state legislature, both parties to take important action and make important decision to balance state budget by increasing taxes revenue by 50% and budget cuts by 50%.

Posted by Fu-Hsian Chang from Bemidji, MN | April 1, 2011 12:57 PM


None of us are ever happy with any compromise; they obviously have parts that are palatable to the respective positions. While good minds ought to be able to synthesize positions and generate new approaches, that doesn't happen in politics. So, we are left with the compromise. What's any better at this time than a 50/50 tax/cuts solution?

Posted by Valerie Geaither | April 1, 2011 2:29 PM


I am an adjunct faculty member at one of the public colleges and I work full time in a private business. The costs of insurance and benefits is what is killing education and that is what the union and faculty are upset about. Currently, they do not pay any health care premiums for themselves. The legislature wants to change that and they should. How does impact education? It doesn't it impacts only the union member benefits.

Posted by Michael Smith from Kenyon, MN | April 1, 2011 8:59 PM


Monte Bute is right on target. Education is a public good that is essential to the economic health and well being of every citizen in Minnesota. When the economy takes a collective nosedive, we all suffer.
Because public goods provide long term benefits to the many, they usually lack strong organized support in the legislature and therefore are often the first victims of cost cutting legislative warriors who are more interested in short-term solutions to protect the much better organized special interests that help fund their re-election.
Legislators have a difficult job dealing with all the conflicting organized interests screaming for special attention, but they could actually make their jobs easier if they focused more on protecting the public good and dealing with issues from that broader perspective. It is certainly easier to cut business taxes than to build an effective public educational system and it is precisely the well educated workforce in Minnesota that makes our state more attractive to employers than most southern states which have low business taxes, but lack a well educated workforce. Let's hope the legislature does not kill the goose that keep laying those golden eggs because it will take much longer for the state to repair a badly damaged educational system than it will take another state to simply lower their taxes below those in Minnesota.

Posted by Ed Malecki from Maplewood, MN | April 2, 2011 3:17 PM


Post a comment

Please be civil, brief and relevant.

E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Terms and Conditions before posting.

Inform our coverage and become a source in the Public Insight Network.

* indicates required field

*
*
*
 

characters remaining!"

You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.