Much has been written about the decline of religion and rise of secularism in America and the rest of the developed world. Prospects for a turnaround reside, paradoxically, with those I call the New Atheists.
Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and colleagues ridicule scriptural passages that depict a vengeful, terrorist God and that sanction misogyny, homophobia and child abuse. In so doing, they goad religious people and institutions to update our maps of reality.
The New Atheists may not be reaching the literalists. Moderates and liberals, however, and those who identify as "spiritual but not religious," cannot so easily ignore their critiques. I certainly couldn't.
"The End of Faith" by Sam Harris and "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins made me squirm. I am, after all, a preacher. I initially steered clear of questioning the widespread practice of seeking guidance and inspiration in ancient texts. Now, however, I do question a reverence for unchanging holy books while modern discoveries take a backseat or have no seat at all.
And so my sermons now begin, "Today's scripture reading is from cosmologist Carl Sagan." (Pause for laughter.) "Science is, at least in part, informed worship."
Lately, I've been going further. "The New Atheists are God's prophets," I proclaim in pulpits, podcasts, and blog posts.
The New Atheists, I suggest, are not enemies of religion; they are modern-day prophets. Prophets traditionally were those who chastised their people for having fallen out of sync with their time, with "God's ways." "Come into right relationship with reality," they warned, "or perish!"
Today's science-oriented atheists call us into right relationship with our time, and that means using all of our best information and cross-cultural experience.
Ours is a time of space telescopes, electron microscopes, supercomputers and the worldwide web. It is also a time of smart bombs, collapsing economies and exploding oil platforms. This is not a time for parsing the lessons given to a few goatherds, tentmakers and camel drivers.
We should let today's collective intelligence revitalize our faith traditions. We should rejoice in the discovery that the atoms of our bodies were forged inside supernovas, and celebrate this natural process as divine.
The story of evolution can be told in ways that help us be grateful that we are related to everything -- not just monkeys, but jellyfish and zucchini too. We can marvel at how rapidly our species has learned to care and cooperate in ever-widening circles: from family groups and tribes all the way to nation-states, and now globally. An evolutionary God can be as vast, as real and as all-embracing as our creative cosmos, and no more inclined than the universe to take sides in matters of war, weather or geological upheaval.
There will come a time when religious leaders derive guidance and inspiration from our common creation story and teach and preach the discoveries of science as God's word. When that day arrives, our faith traditions will thrive -- and perhaps a few of us will look back and thank God for the prophets who appeared as atheists.
----
Michael Dowd, an ordained minister who describes himself as an "evolutionary evangelist," is author of "Thank God for Evolution: How the Marriage of Science and Religion Will Transform Your Life and Our World."
I'm not going to lie, but I think this article is crap. He essentially says "embrace science, and then realize god created that science". I can't believe he even mentions Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins in this article since everything they say in their books denounce what this author is trying to say in this article.
I like this article; I think Dowd is on to something when he says atheists may be prophets, and I say this as a divinity school graduate. One way I relate to this article is by considering what my sources of authority are. For just the reasons Dowd says, "a reverence for unchanging holy books" is problematic when our learning is increasing all the time. Atheists are pointing out this contradition. The problem as I see it is not so much "the reverence for unchanging holy books" but more the uncritical acceptance of one's interpretation of these holy books. I can and do treat the Bible as one source of authority, but I rely on other sources of authority as well, such as church tradition (the whole historical tradition as well as local traditions that sometimes stand in opposition to the larger church tradition). Additional sources of authority include creation, reason, and individual experience. All these sources of authority can help us understand our universe and learn to live good lives.
Please be civil, brief and relevant.
E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.