Photo: #Dane Smith, St. Paul, is the president of Growth & Justice, which describes itself as "a progressive think tank committed to making Minnesota's economy simultaneously more prosperous and fair."

Commentary

In the new decade, let's reinvest in the common good

by Dane Smith
December 30, 2009

NPR and MPR have some intriguing hindsight conversations going on right now, asking whether America has been remade in the last year and offering looks back at President Obama's first year and at national politics in general.

Watch for more retrospective commentary as we mark the end of one of the worst years in the economic history of Minnesota and the United States. It's also the end of one of the worst decades in modern times for most ordinary Americans.

Low- and middle-income folks lost ground, and those in the top 1 percent or the top 10 percent benefited enormously and disproportionately from whatever economic growth occurred between the two big recessions. Those successful households, bless them, now have a greater share of wealth and income than the top tier has enjoyed since 1929, just before the Great Depression.

And it was an era of unprecedented state and federal tax cuts. An analysis by the Minnesota Budget Project chronicles how cuts dictated by the "no new taxes'' dogma affected our quality of life and our economy.

The pundits will offer us a zillion other theoretical causes for the hard times, from the 9/11 trauma at the start of this blighted decade, to dislocations from a more globalized economy, to the federal deregulation of financial institutions.

And indeed, it's best not to get too invested in a single-bullet theory. But let us not forget that the millennium was ushered in with grandiose promises from free-market zealots that we would achieve unprecedented prosperity as a result of truly large income tax cuts at both the federal level (capital gains cuts too) and the state level, mostly benefiting high-income families.

Those permanent income tax cuts -- the largest in Minnesota's history -- had a huge impact. The accumulated revenue loss has cost our national government hundreds of billions. The annual loss in Minnesota now amounts to about $1 billion a year.

The tax cuts did not, as supply-siders promised, make us all richer. Instead, those lost revenues now are a major factor in our mounting national deficit. And the cuts in Minnesota obviously help explain our chronic state and local budget shortfalls.

At least partly because we shrank our public sector by unprecedented levels this decade, we have made college much more expensive, diminished the quality of our public schools, failed to invest in proven early childhood interventions, neglected our roads and bridges and public works infrastructure, and underinvested in health care and economic security for middle- and lower-income households.

As we ring in the New Year and a new decade, let's resolve to reinvest -- in the smartest and most cost-effective ways -- for our common good, and not be afraid to at least restore the public revenues that provided a foundation for a more shared prosperity in our nation and state.

Dane Smith is president of Growth & Justice, which describes itself as a progressive research and advocacy organization that focuses on Minnesota tax and budget issues and economics.

Comments (2)

Thank you for this excellent commentary. All too often the emphasis is on the individual and how each of us should only care about keeping our pennies. Meanwhile, the value of our common good becomes impoverished. Let us remember "no man is an island" and pooling our resources in the form of taxes is the best way for us to make sure we share a future that is worth experiencing. Tax cutting is a short term benefit - much like a drug fix - more is wanted later- and then we realize we are "hooked" on a "benefit" that only leads us to ruin.

Posted by Martha Gerkey from MN | December 30, 2009 12:45 PM


Free market zealots??? Blaming the free market might be convenient, but there is very little free market about the US economy. America has Corporatism. Capitalism/Free-Market wouldn't have a Federal Register 80,000 plus pages long. Capitalism wouldn't have a Tax Code that is 50,000 plus pages long. These books allow the Federal government to centrally plan the economy to help whoever get re-elected by handing out favors to corporations so they can prevent competition through these very regulations.

Posted by Robert Nogler from Minneapolis, MN | December 30, 2009 4:15 PM


Post a comment

Please be civil, brief and relevant.

E-mail addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. MPR reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air with attribution. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.

Inform our coverage and become a source in the Public Insight Network.

* indicates required field

*
*
*
 

characters remaining!"

You must be 13 or over to submit information to Minnesota Public Radio. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited e-mail and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Latest News & Features


News Cut

with Bob Collins