Sample Blog Header

What beloved children's books should not be adapted to the screen?

Posted at 6:00 AM on October 19, 2009 by Eric Ringham (20 Comments)
Filed under: Culture

The film adaptation of Maurice Sendak's "Where the Wild Things Are" opened this weekend. What beloved children's books should not be adapted to the screen?

Comments texted to MPR:

"A Wrinkle in Time". -Melissa, Duluth, MN
"Goodnight Moon" should not be adapted to big screen. -Lisa, St. Paul, MN
No Dr. Suess should be filmed. Did you see "Cat in the Hat"? -Donna Grandin, ND
"Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs". -Charlie, Minneapolis, MN
"The Giving Tree" by Sendak. -Sue S., White Bear Township, MN
There is no limit to what can be adapted to the screen. To suggest that we should limit it is to stifle creativity. -Matt, Brainerd, MN
As long as someone like Spike Jones directs, the book is in good hands. -Josh
Why don't you just call it "the elderly hate change"? What a silly and loaded question. -Mookie, St. Paul, MN
No children's books should be made into movies. Children should be reading, not watching a screen. -Robert Collins, Eden Prairie, MN

From Twitter:

"Everybody Poops". -@jpwest
Goodnight Moon. -@andreakremer

Share your reply in the comments: What beloved children's books should not be adapted to the screen?


Comments (20)

Lord of the Flies should never have been made into a movie, because it felt somewhat inappropriate for the age that was the movie's intended audience. The book can teach children a lot, but a movie helps them visualize the childish cruelty that I would not want a child to see.

Posted by Marina | October 23, 2009 6:03 PM


I don't like it when they make any children's book into a movie and market it to adults. I don't think there are any children's books that shouldn't be made into movies as a general principal, but a lot of them would not translate well at all, and when they turn it into an adult movie in disguise, such as Wild Things, Horton, and the live version of The Grinch, they destroy the magic of that movie and, by association, the book for the children. They take it away from the kids and tell them, "It's mine. Go away now!"

Posted by Jenny | October 19, 2009 5:52 PM


Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card. Maybe not a children's book per se but I read it as a child.

Posted by Brian | October 19, 2009 3:50 PM


BTW - The Very Hungry Caterpillar is already a "video".

My kids got it on a collection of Carle story "videos". (warning: don't buy videos for other people's kids without asking the parents first) ...
It's totally lame with basically a series of still pictures I could probably do with my computer's video editing program. It's really an excuse to put your kids in front of a TV and have "someone" "read" to them, because that's pretty much all it is.

Posted by Elizabeth T | October 19, 2009 2:04 PM


I may have said "The Secret Garden," but the film adaptation was done so well that I like it as well as the book. Same thing goes for "A Little Princess."

Posted by Mary | October 19, 2009 1:30 PM


Goodnight Moon

Posted by Stuart | October 19, 2009 12:16 PM


The Very Hungry Caterpillar.

Nothing good for children could come from a movie with that title.

Posted by Adam H | October 19, 2009 12:09 PM


Stories are meant to be told. Telling them on a big screen is fine. No limits.

I could see it being difficult to translate "When Sophie Gets Angry".

Posted by kennedy | October 19, 2009 11:21 AM


Hollywood will not leave childrens literature alone! I wish they would either stay true to the story or at least not change the plot in major ways. Great example of an adaptation: Coraline. Bad example: City of Ember.

Posted by Ann W, Mounds View | October 19, 2009 11:15 AM


Any of the Dr. Seuss books.

Posted by Karen | October 19, 2009 9:52 AM


The Very Hungry Caterpillar! The story is great, but how to get 2 hours out of it??

Posted by Jen | October 19, 2009 8:51 AM


No Fighting, No Biting

Posted by Tim | October 19, 2009 8:34 AM


Everyone Poops.

Posted by Jessica Anderson | October 19, 2009 8:33 AM


Harold and the Purple Crayon

Posted by Steve | October 19, 2009 8:07 AM


The Giving Tree.

Posted by Shane | October 19, 2009 8:06 AM


One series that should NOT have been made into a movie is "Winnie the Pooh." A generation has been deprived of the delightful combination of A.A. Milne's stories and drawings and the fun of hearing their own parents don various voices to portray the characters.

Posted by Kit Hansen | October 19, 2009 8:05 AM


Where the Wild things are. H.R. Puffenstuff meets E.T.

Posted by Kevin | October 19, 2009 8:03 AM


I wish no children's books written before 1985 would be made into movies. I don't want the pictures I have in my head to disappear!

Posted by Sarah | October 19, 2009 7:51 AM


Alexander and the No Good, Very Bad Day

Posted by Kara | October 19, 2009 7:41 AM


Where's Waldo.

Posted by Perrin | October 19, 2009 7:36 AM


Post a comment

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>
Fields marked with * are required.


Comment Preview appears above this form upon pressing the "preview" button. Edit your comment and press "preview" again, until you are satisfied with your comment.

Your comment may not appear on the blog until several minutes after it was submitted.

October 2009
S M T W T F S
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31


Master Archive

Public Insight Network

The Public Insight Network draws upon your experiences to help shape our coverage.
More

MPR News
Radio

Listen Now

On Air

Midmorning

Other Radio Streams from MPR

Classical MPR
Radio Heartland

Services