State of the Arts

State of the Arts: August 3, 2012 Archive

The reviews are in for the Minnesota Fringe - part one

Posted at 2:04 AM on August 3, 2012 by Marianne Combs
Filed under: Dance, Events, Theater

Theater folk of all stripes showed up at The Crooked Pint in Minneapolis Thursday night to swap reviews, work off their opening night jitters and just generally celebrate the Minnesota Fringe Festival. It was a festive occasion, and spirits were high.

I grabbed myself a booth, opened up my lap-top, and typed furiously as people talked about the productions they saw. Some of the stand outs? Class of '98 and Ash Land were both big hits. Read on for the details...

FringeHeatherMeyer.jpgHeather Meyer is in the show Merblades, but that doesn't open until tonight so she had Thursday free to check out some other work. Her favorite of the evening? Class of '98:

Heather: I saw three shows, but this was definitely the best of the three I've seen so far. I thought it was just a delight. Its was relentlessly spirited; as soon as it started we were on a ride. It was smart and hilarious. It has these amazingly talented teenagers in it who were just going for it. I was really impressed with the teenagers . Everyone was really committed to the show. It was fast, and with a great soundtrack full of 1998 hits.

FringeDebraMadde.jpg Debra Berger and Madde Gibba are also in Merblades, and had lots to share on all three shows they saw, including Class of'98, Billy Beechwood and the Mountain of Terror, and Gay Banditos.

Debra: I thought Billy Beachwood was clever - I loved the pacing. They have a very minimalist style, with well-crafted, heartwarming characters.

Madde Gibba: It's a typical Ferrari McSpeedy show: high energy, fast-paced goofiness for the sake of goofiness.

Gay Banditos is probably going to be the best satire of the Fringe. It made some really thoughtful points in a way that made us uncomfortable, but made us think and laugh at the same time. Hysterical. You should just go for Ben Thietje's walkie-talkie voice-over scene.

As for Class of '98, you should go now because it's going to sell out. It's one of the best crafted Fringe shows I've ever seen. Fast paced, hilarious - this show has so much heart. It's a real joy to see two people so enjoying each others creativity and being tickled by that.

Friendship and honesty and just pure joy - those were really the themes of the evening. Everybody was having a blast tonight, and the audiences were, too.

FringeClarenceKarin.jpgClarence Wethern has performed in previous Fringe festivals, but this year he's sticking to the audience. Wethern reports that tonight the big surprise came at the 5:30 showing of The Gentlemen's Pratfall Club:

Clarence: Co-star Levi Weinhagen busted his chin open at the end of the show, doing a pratfall. But despite this it was a really funny. His character is learning how to fall down, and the first time he actually makes a pratfall it's "an accident" but in truth he actually hit his chin. But he's totally fine, he's okay. I'm looking forward to seeing what other damage he incurs in the run of the show. Josh Scrimshaw falls down the entire show - that man is made of rubber. It's a family friendly show, but not a kids show.

Class of 98 was hysterical. I saw these guys in "Freaky Kids Show" last year and it was one of the funniest shows I saw all year, not just in the Fringe. This show has just an amazing abundance of heart. It's a time travel nostalgia comedy, and 1998 happens to be my graduating year - I'm the target demographic! Plus I'm a fan of Back to the Future and other sci-fi comedies - so it was really the perfect fringe show.

Carin Bratlie adds that Class of 98 is a production that "understands the Fringe."

Carin: It has all the elements: scrappy, balls to the wall, just cramming it in time-wise. The stakes are very high, and the performers use the high stakes in a "bringing us along for the ride" way. Everyone was so committed to what they were doing and just having a lot of fun, and the energy was infectious. I was having a lot of fun, I was rooting for them, the characters as well as the actors. It's simple in a good way. They don't try to do too much, they do the best that you can do at the Fringe.

I also saw Nucleus and other cell bodies - a modern dance piece at the Southern. It was like "Rite of Spring" for Amoebas! It was as if I was watching one of those 1950s film strips of what you see through a microscope. I didn't get it all, but I didn't need to, because their physicality was so engaging - viscous and visceral at the same time. I could really see the interaction of single cell organisms in a petrie dish being played out on the stage. I was not disappointed - the Fringe is a great place to see modern dance.

FringeCarolineNick.jpgCaroline Toll and Nick Vetter met at the Fringe, fell in love, and have been devoted hard-core Fringers ever since. They saw a number of shows on opening night, but the one that really stood out for them was Ash Land:

Caroline: It was tremendous! They are one of the things you come to the Fringe for. They're so unique; they regularly get standing ovations. This company, whatever they do has this magical component because the actors are the scenery, the props...
Nick: ...a squeaky screen door or a rocking chair... It's visual and movement based storytelling about people trying to survive in the Dust Bowl.
Caroline: It's a story about a way of life that's dying out. It's also about foreclosure, so even though it dates to the depression, it's also a modern saga. I'm not a big fan of dance in general, but their shows are so compelling.
Nick: This show also had the longest artists line I've ever seen - that's the rush line for other Fringe artists - which tells you that this is one of the shows that theater people are really talking about.

FringeScottPakudaitis.jpgScott Pakudaitis is another hard-core Fringer. He plans to make it to all 56 time slots in this year's Fringe Festival, and in fact he hasn't missed an opportunity to see a Fringe show since 2006. His two favorites of the evening? Nucleus and Other Cell Bodies, and Ash Land.

Scott: Ash Land was a piece of beautiful physical theater, and the topic of foreclosure and profiteering is as timely now as it was during the dustbowl. With Nucleus and other cell bodies my brain went places I had no idea it was going. It was hypnotic and yet accurate. It was just beautiful to watch, a really remarkable dance piece.

FringeTimWick.jpgTim Wick - who co-wrote The Complete Works of William Shatner (abridged) was not nearly as pleased with Nucleus and Other Bodies, a reaction he knows is partly due to the presence of his two boys, aged seven and 12:

Tim: The show was advertised as appropriate for ages and 7 and up, and technically that's true - but the problem is this is 50 minutes of hard core modern dance, and my kids were practically chewing off their limbs to get out of the theater, but we were sitting in the front row... I did not like their show - I felt it was long, the music was repetitive and dull, and there weren't a lot of moments where I was caught up in the movement. But I can't separate whether it was just the show, or because my kids were freaking out. It was billed as a silly dance show, but it just wasn't accessible show at all, which made it hard to watch. Would I have like the show if my kids weren't there? No, but I would have disliked it less probably. So don't take the age rating seriously.

Wick also took his boys to Gentleman's Pratfall Club, which they loved, despite the chin-splitting incident.

Tim: He hurt himself for his art and I think that's important! They were giggling throughout the show. Levi and Josh are really good at figuring what's going to make kids laugh and entertain adults as well.

I also took the kids to see BOOGIEography, which is directed by a friend of mine. The kids, who had just come from Nucleus, were horrified that they were headed to another dance show, but they loved it. There was an F-bomb dropped a few times at the end, so as a parent you have to decide whether or not you're okay with that.

After that I went on to see Ash Land. I'm a comedian, so I tend to prefer comedy, and I'm really picky about seeing a serious show. But this company's reputation sold me on seeing it. It's a choreographed play, excellently constructed, very well acted. I absolutely recommend it.

That's it for opening night... Tune in later this weekend for another round of reviews for shows that opened Friday and Saturday.

Lessons learned from "The Queen of Versailles"

Posted at 4:40 PM on August 3, 2012 by Euan Kerr
Filed under: Film, People, Storytelling

Siegals1.jpg
David and Jackie Siegal in "Queen of Versailles" (All images courtesy Magnolia Pictures)

While Lauren Greenfield has been using photography to explore the sociology of American life for 20 years, it turns out that one of her pivotal pictures was of a handbag.

Greenfield, who was working on a project about wealth and consumerism and the American Dream, found herself at a Donatella Versace event in Beverly Hills, where she met one of the designers biggest customers, a woman called Jackie Siegal.

"And I made a photograph of her purse and two other purses, very gold, very blingy purses, that Time Magazine used in their photos of the year to illustrate what they were calling the New Gilded Age" said Greenfield. "This was in the end of 2007. And when Jackie told me they were building the biggest house in America I was hooked."

greenfield1.jpgIt turned out that Siegal, and her husband David, the president of the largest time-share organization in the world, were in the process of building a huge edifice on a large lot in Orlando Fl. using a design based on the palace of Versailles in Paris, and the Paris Hotel in Las Vegas

Greenfield (right) asked if she could make a film about the house, and the Siegals agreed.

Greenfield says she was interested in the way that homes had become not just a place to live, but a symbol of success and identity. During the real estate boom a few years ago the Siegals took the phenomenon to new heights.

They decided they needed more space, and designed their 90,000 square foot dream home, complete with grand staircase and stained glass domed roof. Even as builders worked on putting up the walls the building was eye-popping.

However Greenfield soon saw her film would revolve round Jackie. She's a woman who had survived a hard-scrabble upbringing, and a bad first marriage to become a beauty queen and then wife of a billionaire 30 years her senior. At times she is quite humble, and at others wildly ostentatious. She relates how she never wanted to have many children, but when she married David she knew she didn't need to worry about money, so she had seven, and then had a troubled teenage niece move in too.

family.jpg
Jackie Siegal and some of her children in "Queen of Versailles"

The film crew got to follow Jackie as she purchased truckloads of furnishings for the uncompleted house. It was a garish mixture of valuable antiques and 21st century knick-knacks where volume was as important as quality. She also took the crew on tours of the cavernous skeleton of the house as work continued, pointing out her enormous closet which a friend mistakes for a bedroom. There is even a special balcony designed so the family can watch the nightly fireworks over Disney World.

Then the real estate bubble burst, and Lauren Greenfield found herself making a very different film.

Work stopped on the house, David laid off thousands of workers in the time-share business, and the giant Siegal household had to downsize. Things got so tight, David realized he had to sell Versailles

"In 2010 when they had to put their house on the market, when Jackie and David had to put their dream house of Versailles up for sale and had to give up that dream, at that point I realized that their story was really an allegory for the overreaching of America, and a supersized version of what so many people had gone through," said Greenfield.

"The Queen of Versailles" follows the Siegals increasingly desperate attempts to stay above water. Because the Siegals are so open, and in many ways like the family next door, Greenfield found she could relate to the family's troubles.

"It begins as something you might take vicarious pleasure in," said Greenfield. "And by the end you realize its the story that happened to all of us and when David says no-one is without guilt, this is a vicious cycle, we can all put ourselves in that place too, whether it's spending too much on your credit cards or using our homes as piggy banks."

She describes it as the hardest project she has ever done, but now the film is done, and has been drawing great critical attention, Greenfield says it's been worth it.

"Making a documentary is kind of an existential experience in that you don't really know if it will see the light of day and if anyone will care," she said. "And so to have a documentary being released in the theaters is a filmmakers dream, and the fact that it opened Sundance is a huge honor for me."

Of course the story isn't done. The house went into foreclosure, but since the film was completed David found a way to get it out. He says he still intends to finish it, even though it will take $30 million more to do that.

"It does seem, in the post-crash world, it seems very ambitious to the point of irrationality to finish the house," says Greenfield.

Meanwhile David Siegal is suing Greenfield for defamation, even as Jackie is making publicity appearances on behalf of the film.

"Despite the lawsuit," she said "I am very very grateful to the Siegals for the access that they gave me and the candor with which they shared their lives."

"They are at once completely outsized and in a fantasy, and at the same time strangely familiar and even down to earth in a crazy way. That is the contradiction of the American dream."

August 2012
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Master Archive

New Series

Art Heroes

MPR News
Radio

Listen Now

On Air

The World

Other Radio Streams from MPR

Classical MPR
Radio Heartland

Services

This activity is made possible in part by the Minnesota Legacy Amendment's Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund