Posted at 11:06 AM on May 16, 2011
by Marianne Combs
Filed under: Criticism, Music

Dawn Upshaw and Maria Schneider with the SPCO
MPR Photo/Melanie Burford
The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra performed Friday night in the first Spring for Music Festival at Carnegie Hall on Friday night.
Anthony Tommasini reviewed the concert for the New York Times as part of a larger piece on the Festival. Here's what he had to say:
On Friday night, for the sixth of the festival's seven concerts, the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra offered a program that had no title and no discernible theme. Yet the four pieces presented made sense as a group. It opened with Stravinsky's Concerto in D for string orchestra, a 1946 work from the composer's Neo-Classical period, and ended with Haydn's "London" Symphony, a landmark of the Viennese Classical era. These works framed a recent piece for voice and chamber orchestra by Maria Schneider, the jazz composer and big-band leader, and a group of five folk songs for soprano and string orchestra by Bartok, both featuring Dawn Upshaw.Instead of relying on a music director, the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra collaborates with five artistic partners, including Ms. Upshaw, who had asked Ms. Schneider to write her a piece. The resulting work, "Carlos Drummond de Andrade Stories," is a setting of poems by a revered Brazilian poet translated into English by the poet Mark Strand. Written in 2008, this was Ms. Schneider's "first classical venture," as she put it in a program note. She conducted it here.
The dark and vivid first poem describes a group of people making fun of photos in a dusty old album of "the dead in frock coats." The settings of all four poems, which include a wry romantic roundelay ("Quadrille"), flow together in this organic 25-minute work. Ms. Schneider sets the words to sultry music lightly touched with jazz in the style of Gil Evans.
The harmonic writing is piercing and precise; the mood ambiguous, at once pensive and restless. The vocal writing deftly blends quasi-conversational phrases with soaring lyricism. The only miscalculation may have been the stretches, including a Prologue, in which the soprano sings wordless phrases on "ah" and "da-dee" sounds, which came across as generic, even though Ms. Upshaw sang alluringly, like a jazz vocalist leading an orchestra.
She was in better, more penetrating voice for the Bartok folk songs. Richard Tognetti's string orchestra arrangements lent depth to the accompaniments, while still retaining some of the bite of the original piano parts.
The St. Paul Chamber Orchestra often plays without a conductor, as it did here in the Stravinsky and Haydn works. These impressive musicians gave vibrant, natural performances of both pieces. Still, the playing might have been a little crisper with a conductor leading the way.
The SPCO performance was broadcast live on Minnesota Public Radio's classical station. Did you miss it? No worries, you can find it here.
Posted at 2:41 PM on May 16, 2011
by Marianne Combs
Filed under: Criticism, People, Theater

Shanan Custer
Shanan Custer is an extraordinary comedienne, actor and writer. She's also a veteran of Brave New Workshop. Today on MinnesotaPlaylist.com, Custer writes about the jobs one chooses, sometimes for the love of the work, and sometimes to pay the bills.
It's a hilarious rant, but one comment she made stuck out at me:
The business we work in is strange for many reasons, but particularly for this: we apologize or see it as a possible liability if we do any work that is popular to a wider audience. Put another way, if a lot of people like something then, ipso facto, it must not be very good (this is the first time I've used the phrase "ipso facto" in a sentence and I think it went pretty well). The issue revolves around the term "wider" audience, I think. If a show is meant to connect with a certain segment of the population that we find socially undesirable (people with jobs and houses in mostly white neighborhoods with gun racks in their basement) then we say, "Well, it is what it is! I'm getting out as soon as I can to do some real stuff! Pays the bills!" If the show connects with a more desirable audience (people with jobs and houses in properly diverse neighborhoods and no gun racks), then we say, "I'm so proud to be a part of this! I feel so lucky!"
We know that sometimes great works of art aren't popular straight off the bat. That's why we have non-profit organizations in the first place - because they could rarely get by on ticket sales. But does being popular imply a lack of artistic quality?
| May 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||