Capitol View

Latz: Minnesota Senate isn't run by NRA

Posted at 3:55 PM on March 6, 2013 by Tom Scheck (4 Comments)
Filed under: MN Legislature, Mark Dayton

Sen. Ron Latz, DFL-St. Louis Park, had some harsh words Wednesday for those who say the Senate should just pass a gun control bill that was negotiated by House Democrats and Republicans, the Minnesota Sheriffs Association and gun rights groups.

The group announced legislation today that would forbid convicted felons from possessing ammunition (they're already banned from possessing firearms) and increase penalties for so-called straw purchases, where people buy guns for others who are forbidden to own them. The bill would also speed up disclosure to a federal database that lists mentally ill people who shouldn't carry a weapon.

The measure doesn't include universal background checks for gun purchases - which the National Rifle Association and the Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance oppose. Latz says he'll continue to push for universal background checks regardless of the NRA's position.

"I won't concede that the NRA runs the state Senate." Latz said. "I'm not going to do something or not do something just because the NRA says do it or don't do it."

Latz said he believes the Senate Judiciary Committee has the votes to pass universal background checks.

Rep. Michael Paymar, DFL-St. Paul, said he'll continue to push for background checks in the Public Safety Committee which he chairs, despite signs that the committee won't approve a bill including that provision.

Gov. Dayton told reporters today that he supports expanded background checks but wouldn't say whether he'd veto gun legislation that didn't include the language.

Andrew Rothman, with the Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance, said he believes background checks won't reach Dayton's desk.

"He's going to have to decide the same thing Rep. Paymar is," Rothman said. "Gov. Dayton is going to have to decide whether he wants to sign a good bill or veto a good bill and get nothing."

Rothman said the alternative legislation focuses on those who shouldn't own guns while protecting the constitutional rights of everyone else.

The so-called compromise legislation does not have a Senate author yet.


Comments (4)

Someone needs to tell that jackwagon that the MN Senate isn't run by GLAAD or any other LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ group, either. I'm sure he's just as offended when they tell him to pass certain bills (like the newly proposed gay "marriage" bill).

Posted by Jay McHue | March 6, 2013 4:25 PM


Americans don't need hillbilly gun rights. We will protect you from yourselves, To save the world. Regardless, gun control IS COMING. Not even the president could stop it. It has been done successfully virtually everywhere else and certainly will be done here.

Posted by Gehad | March 6, 2013 4:49 PM


I believe that Mr. Gehad (however unwittingly) has provided clarity to this debate on two counts. First, most who support second amendment rights believe in an individual's right and ability to make decisions on his or her own behalf while those like Mr. Gehad have the condesending and patronizing belief that the rest of us are idiots and need to be protected from ourselves as he so succinctly states. Second, Mr. Gehad also makes clear that those in his camp sincerely believe that those of us who disagree with his position are racists, biggots, or in his word "hillbillies." What say you all?... Do you want Mr. Gehad and his camp making decisions for you.

Posted by Jay | March 6, 2013 10:38 PM


I believe that Mr. Gehad (however unwittingly) has provided clarity to this debate on two counts. First, most who support second amendment rights believe in an individual's right and ability to make decisions on his or her own behalf while those like Mr. Gehad have the condesending and patronizing belief that the rest of us are idiots and need to be protected from ourselves as he so succinctly states. Second, Mr. Gehad also makes clear that those in his camp sincerely believe that those of us who disagree with his position are racists, biggots, or in his word "hillbillies." What say you all?... Do you want Mr. Gehad and his camp making decisions for you.

Posted by Jay | March 6, 2013 10:39 PM


Post a comment

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>
Fields marked with * are required.


Comment Preview appears above this form upon pressing the "preview" button. Edit your comment and press "preview" again, until you are satisfied with your comment.

Your comment may not appear on the blog until several minutes after it was submitted.

March 2013
S M T W T F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            


Master Archive

About Poligraph

The feature examines statements made by Minnesota politicians and checks them for accuracy. Based on data analysis, document reviews and interviews with non-partisan analysts, statements are rated true, misleading, false or inconclusive. More

MPR News
Radio

Listen Now

Other Radio Streams from MPR

Classical MPR
Radio Heartland

Services