Posted at 6:40 AM on February 28, 2012
by Catharine Richert
(2 Comments)
Filed under: Daily Digest
Welcome to the Daily Digest where the GOP is weighing an alternative to voter ID, the St. Croix bridge could get a vote this week, and Arizona and Michigan hold their primaries today.
Around Minnesota
Republicans are weighing an alternative to a voter ID legislation. The bill would incorporate "electronic poll books," technology that Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has said is a less expensive alternative to a state-issued voter ID card.
With a federal subsidy gone, ethanol margins have dropped sharply.
The Minnesota Senate passed a bill that would let schools lay off teachers based on performance.
Rushford school officials hope a bonding bill will help pay for a new school.
DFLers want to pay back the school shift with higher corporate taxes.
A Senate committee passed two bills supported by Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, a group that opposes abortion.
In Washington
President Barack Obama wants the nation's governors to invest more in education.
A vote in the U.S. House on the St. Croix bridge could come as early as tomorrow.
The National Journal says that Rep. Keith Ellison was among the most liberal Democrats in the House in 2011 based on his voting record.
In Wisconsin
Gov. Scott Walker says he won't be challenging the signatures that would force a recall election.
On the Minnesota Campaign Trail
Two GOP Senate candidates are backing out of their bid to oust Sen. Amy Klobuchar.
On the Presidential Campaign Trail
Michigan and Arizona hold their primaries today.
Both Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum were in Michigan campaigning.
At least one poll shows that Santorum has a very narrow lead in Michigan, the state where Romney was born and raised and where his father was governor.
Santorum is seeking Democratic support in the Michigan primaries. Anyone can vote in the state's nominating contest.
Newt Gingirch is criticizing Santorum as a "big labor Republican."
Santorum is getting flack for his calling Obama a "snob" for suggesting kids go to college.
Politico explains why Romney isn't attacking Santorum on social issues.
Romney has a lead over Rick Santorum nationally, according to the latest Gallup poll.
Romney will campaign in Fargo Thursday.
The extent of the Romney campaign's reliance on outside firms is unusual, the Washington Post reports.
(2 Comments)
Posted at 12:56 PM on February 28, 2012
by Tim Pugmire
Filed under: Recount
Critics of Secretary of State Mark Ritchie and his oversight of state election law have filed a federal lawsuit aimed at tightening the enforcement of voter-eligibility requirements.
The Minnesota Voters Alliance, the Minnesota Freedom Council and several individuals, contend that election officials have not been following the eligibility criteria detailed in the state constitution. They claim there are still unanswered questions about tens of thousands of people whose votes were counted in 2008 and 2010, when statewide recounts were needed to decide key races. During a news conference today to announce the lawsuit, attorney Erick Kaardal said ballots cast by ineligible voters are "poisoning the pool."
"The Emmer recount contest was flawed, because there was no process after the ballots are counted of these ineligible voters in the election contest of separating out the ineligible voters' votes from those that were eligible," Kaardal said. "This system is designed to fail."
State Rep. Sondra Erickson, R-Princeton, is also a plaintiff in the lawsuit. Erickson lost a recount in 2008. She ran again in 2010 and won. But Erickson said questions remain about some of the votes cast in her House district four years ago and about the eligibility of some people who registered at the polls.
"I want to be a part of this lawsuit and ensure that our constitution is honored, and that the secretary of state's office is also honoring a responsibility they have to verify those registrations," Erickson said.
A spokeswoman for Mark Ritchie said the Secretary of State's office was reviewing the lawsuit but did not plan to comment on the pending litigation.
| February 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | |||