The Minnesota Supreme Court has dismissed a suit by four Minnesota Senators that said a lower court judge doesn't have the authority to authorize spending if a state shutdown occurs. Republican Senators Warren Limmer, Scott Newman, Sean Nienow and Roger Chamberlain filed the petition in the Minnesota Supreme Court last Friday. The court ruled today it didn't hold jurisdiction over the matter but didn't dismiss the challenge on its merits:
"We conclude based on the record before us that the petition does not satisfy the standards we have established for the exercise of our original jurisdiction over a petition for a writ of quo warranto. See Rice v. Connolly, 488 N.W.2d 241, 244 (Minn. 1992) ("While this court retains its original jurisdiction pursuant to Minn. Stat. ยง 480.04 (1990), we today signal our future intention to exercise that discretion in only the most exigent of circumstances."). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition without prejudice."
The four senators still have an avenue to win their case. Attorneys representing the group have also filed a challenge in Ramsey County District Court. Ramsey County Judge Kathleen Gearin is scheduled to hold a hearing on what services should continue if state government shuts down.
Attorney General Lori Swanson and Governor Mark Dayton are asking the judge to decide which services are essential. They also argue that Gearin has the authority to authorize spending. Here's the order issued by the Minnesota Supreme Court:
The feature examines statements made by Minnesota politicians and checks them for accuracy. Based on data analysis, document reviews and interviews with non-partisan analysts, statements are rated either true, false or inconclusive. PoliGraph is a collaboration between Minnesota Public Radio News and the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota.
More
Looking for ways to ensure your students are doing quality research from credible sources? Sound Learning is a launching point to Minnesota Public Radio's content on the Web.