Emmer wants "process" to take its course
Posted at 4:03 PM on November 9, 2010
by Tom Scheck
(3 Comments)
Filed under: Campaign 2010, Campaign 2010: Minnesota Governor, Recount 2010
Republican Tom Emmer says he's going to let the legal process involving a statewide recount of last week's gubernatorial election run its course. But Emmer isn't saying how far he'll push the issue and didn't give a definitive answer about who will make that decision. Emmer talked with reporters today for the first time since Election Night. He refused to say whether he thinks he can make up Democrat Mark Dayton's unofficial lead of nearly 8,800 votes but says outstanding issues remain.
"Since 10AM last Wednesday, we have done nothing but close the gap. I don't know what's going to happen. All I know is that at the end of the day, Minnesotans need to to have confidence that this was done in a fair, open and honest manner. That every vote was counted and this was the outcome that they expected. That the legal process that is in place was followed."
Meanwhile, the state Republican Party announced today that former Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Eric Magnuson will be the chief litigator for the Republican Party and the Emmer campaign.
Side note: Emmer used the term "process" 44 times in his nearly twenty minute news conference.
Comments (3)
What does he mean by this: "Since 10AM last Wednesday, we have done nothing but close the gap"?
In what political universe has he closed the gap?
The numbers shift as the unofficial numbers become more official after the local canvassing boards meet. Rep. Emmer suggests 1000 votes have swung his way since then. MPR's analysis of the vote totals show they've moved 505 votes in that time period.
Can anyone tell me how Emmers gets back and forth into Canada with his multiple DUI convictions?
| November 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
Master Archive
Recent Entries
- Elections and campaign finance bills draw bipartisan support
- Session 2013 in final stretch
- Conference committee agrees to spend $485 million more for schools, early ed
- Water fees dropped from environment budget bill
- Mayo DMC plan is moving
- Gas tax hike and sales tax for transit get scrapped
- House approves legislator pay constitutional amendment
- Republicans try to make issue of IRS PAC contributions
- Bonding bill fails in House
- PoliGraph: Bachmann health premium claim leaves out key details
Categories
- 2011 Freshman class
- 2011 Shutdown
- Bachmann fact check
- Campaign 2008
- Campaign 2008: MN Legislature
- Campaign 2008: President
- Campaign 2008: U.S. MN CD1
- Campaign 2008: U.S. MN CD2
- Campaign 2008: U.S. MN CD3
- Campaign 2008: U.S. MN CD4
- Campaign 2008: U.S. MN CD5
- Campaign 2008: U.S. MN CD6
- Campaign 2008: U.S. Senate
- Campaign 2010
- Campaign 2010: Minnesota Governor
- Campaign 2010: U.S. House
- Campaign 2010: U.S. MN CD1
- Campaign 2010: U.S. MN CD2
- Campaign 2010: U.S. MN CD3
- Campaign 2010: U.S. MN CD4
- Campaign 2010: U.S. MN CD5
- Campaign 2010: U.S. MN CD6
- Campaign 2010: U.S. MN CD7
- Campaign 2010: U.S. MN CD8
- Campaign 2012
- Campaign 2012: Minn. House Races
- Campaign 2012: Minn. Senate Races
- Campaign 2012: Presidential Race
- Campaign 2012: U.S. House
- Campaign 2012: U.S. MN CD1
- Campaign 2012: U.S. MN CD2
- Campaign 2012: U.S. MN CD3
- Campaign 2012: U.S. MN CD4
- Campaign 2012: U.S. MN CD5
- Campaign 2012: U.S. MN CD6
- Campaign 2012: U.S. MN CD7
- Campaign 2012: U.S. MN CD8
- Campaign 2012: U.S. Senate
- Daily Digest
- Iowa
- Mark Dayton
- Marriage Amendment
- Michele Bachmann
- MN Legislature
- MPR in D.C.
- Pawlenty fact check
- Pawlenty travel
- PoliGraph
- Political parties
- Recount
- Recount 2010
- Redistricting
- State Government
- Tim Pawlenty
- U.S. House
- U.S. Senate
- Vikings stadium
- Voter ID Amendment
About Poligraph
The feature examines statements made by Minnesota politicians and checks them for accuracy. Based on data analysis, document reviews and interviews with non-partisan analysts, statements are rated true, misleading, false or inconclusive. MoreServices
- Become a Member
- Member Connect Accounts
- Leadership Circle
- Sustaining Members
- Member Discounts
- Become a Sponsor
- Tax Information
- Planned Giving
- Vehicle Donation
- Donate Stock