A listener from St. Paul sent me this wondering how the Minnesota GOP (which paid for this flyer) could confuse the number of votes needed to end a filibuster (60) with the number of votes needed to override a veto (67).
Should we chalk this up to a last minute lack of proofreading or a poor understanding of the constitution? If the Democrats somehow end up with 67 Senate seats after the election that REALLY would be news!
Comments (1)
There are at least 2 flyers with the same mistake. It's not a one-time thing. Someone with the MN GOP either hasn't read Article 1 Section 2 Clause 7 or the MN GOP is afraid that "filibuster" isn't a compelling argument in this race.
Given Coleman's flip-flop on the filibuster -- every bill deserved an up or down vote when he was a member of the majority, but he has voted repeatedly against cloture as a member of the minority -- I'm not surprised to see the MN GOP is not using the word.
The feature examines statements made by Minnesota politicians and checks them for accuracy. Based on data analysis, document reviews and interviews with non-partisan analysts, statements are rated either true, false or inconclusive. PoliGraph is a collaboration between Minnesota Public Radio News and the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota.
More
Looking for ways to ensure your students are doing quality research from credible sources? Sound Learning is a launching point to Minnesota Public Radio's content on the Web.