No clarification in anti-bullying constitutional question

Posted at 4:12 PM on January 17, 2012 by Bob Collins (1 Comments)
Filed under: Crime and Justice

How far reaching can schools be in policing the behavior of students?

The U.S. Supreme Court had a chance to settle once and for all whether school officials can discipline students for their off-hours, off-school-property activities on social networking sites.

Instead, it punted.

The Court refused to hear two cases, one that said school officials could discipline the students, and one that said school officials cannot.

In Pennsylvania, the parents of a 17-year old senior sued a principal who suspended the student because she created a MySpace page that described him as a "hairy sex addict" and a "pervert" who liked "hitting on students" in his office.

In that case, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals said the school cannot discipline students for their conduct outside of the schoolhouse.

But in another case, the Fourth Circuit Court of appeals ruled a West Virginia senior could be suspended for her MySpace profile that made fun of another girl as a "slut" who had herpes.

In Kowalski's appeal, her lawyer described her as a cheerleader and "the reigning 'charm queen' of her school," but the appeals court threw out her free-speech suit. She "used the Internet to orchestrate a targeted attack on a classmate," the judges said.

"The court needs to explain when school officials have the power to regulate off-campus student speech," David L. Hudson, a First Amendment scholar at Vanderbilt told the Los Angeles Times last week. "The phenomenon of cyber-bullying ratchets up the importance of the issue."

By the way, with the Supreme Court rejection of the appeal in the Pennsylvania case, the school district of the principal who was falsely accused of being a "hairy sex addict" now has to pay the ACLU's attorney fees and damages to the parents who fought it their daughter's suspension..

If you're a school official, is it worth fighting when the parents start calling?

---

Comments (1)

Why should we expect sanity from the court that decided that money is more important than human beings?

Posted by Jim Shapiro | January 17, 2012 3:51 PM

---

Post a comment

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>
Fields marked with * are required.

Name*:

E-mail Address*:

URL:

Remember personal info?

Comments*:

Comment Preview appears above this form upon pressing the "preview" button. Edit your comment and press "preview" again, until you are satisfied with your comment.

Your comment may not appear on the blog until several minutes after it was submitted.

• E-mail this page
• Print this page
• Tweet this page
• Share this

Services

• Hourly Newscast
• HD Radio
• iPhone App / Mobile
• E-mail newsletters
• RSS feeds
• Podcasts
• Submit your photos
• Videos
• Weather
• Most e-mailed stories