Posted at 10:56 AM on June 6, 2011
by Bob Collins
(6 Comments)
Filed under: Economy
Barry Ritholtz at The Big Picture has an intriguing graphic posted today. It's a historical comparison of the top 1% of income owners in major countries.
It comes from the Paris School of Economics, which is also building an online database to allow you to crunch the numbers some more. Unfortunately, it's not entirely built out yet, although you can do a little playing on it.
What happened in 1950 to shoot the Aussies up so high relative to the others? Just how old is Rupert Murdoch, anyway....?
Look at that dot com bubble burst!
Trickle down economics is magical, it makes water run uphill apparently.
I would be interested in seeing the EU as a whole added to that graph, as well as Russia.
Dynastic wealth is making a comeback. Good for the fortunate few, bad for the country.
Facts in isolation are always misleading.
Would be interesting to see this displayed with a graph of average income for the nation over that same period.
Here is a chart for the US:
http://visualizingeconomics.com/2008/05/04/average-income-in-the-united-states-1913-2006/
And then some background on top income earners such as 75% of people who hit the list only make it once (list of top 400 anyways).
http://is.gd/mV2KFV
It is easy to look at something like this and say "wow, those rich guys are getting richer" and forget how we have all gotten very rich ourselves (on average) and that the part of the hill we are climbing make much greater marginal impact in our lives than they are. A boost in income from $30k to $60k is a whole lot more meaningful than a boost from $3MM to $6MM.
| June 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||