Posted at 7:35 AM on April 2, 2010
by Bob Collins
(3 Comments)
Filed under: Five by 8
The Gustavian Weekly, the campus' student newspaper, ran a feature on the tradition that included comments from various folks on and off campus who had something to say about it. And after it was published, student Mary Cunningham (and others, apparently) removed a bunch of papers because, it has been reported, they didn't want visiting prospective students and their families to get the wrong idea about Gustavus.Last month, the newspaper printed this follow-up editorial:
Finally, whether community members agree or disagree with the issues we talk about, or our decision to publish an article on a specific topic, it is important to respect our right as a press organization to talk about these difficult topics. Throwing away newspapers is censorship of The Weekly, and hence the students' voice on campus. When people choose to censor the students' voice on important issues like binge drinking, it silences a problem and does not allow us to discuss productively, which is what we, as an educational institution, need to do.The upshot? There could be a community-wide discussion about binge drinking. Instead it's having one about censorship.
"Let's get this straight: any woman who heads to an EI [fraternity] party as an anonymous onlooker, drinks five cups of the jungle juice, and walks back to a boy's room with him is indicating that she wants sex, OK?" columnist Alex Knepper, 20, wrote in the Eagle, the school paper.
"To cry 'date rape' after you sober up the next morning and regret the incident is the equivalent of pulling a gun to someone's head and then later claiming that you didn't ever actually intend to pull the trigger," he said.
I know there has been some good coverage of the rising c-section rate on MPR. Some of it (if you actually read the care papers) is due to the impulse to induce for no reason, some of it is the impulse to section for no reason. Here's what happens when the care providers do what is automatic, and simply do not think. So many questions: Why didn't they confirm the pregnancy? They had no idea of gestational age (if the woman had been pregnant). They had no prenatal records. This blows my mind!!!!
You might want to make mention that April 2 is Worldwide Autism Awareness Day. I posted something on facebook, it seems to affect almost every family I know in one way or another.A good time to revisit a program that's one-year old today -- the Sensory Friendly Film Program
A regular at the screenings is Marianna Pollock of Virginia Beach, Va., and her six-year-old son, Xander. "We attempted a regular movie a few times," says Pollock. "We always ended up having to leave within the first 15 minutes because Xander gets so excited that he flaps and makes noise. It was very stressful."3) In the wake of a girl's suicide in western Massachusetts because of bullying that adults couldn't or wouldn't step in to stop, Boston is trying to put the genie back in the bottle.
But as the offending Facebook pages come down, new ones go up. Ranny Bledsoe -- principal of Charlestown High School, one of the most severely afflicted schools -- said, "It seems to be an absolute epidemic.''What's Facebook's responsibility in this "modern crime?" Slate tackles the question today in asking whether social networking sites should do a little less to protect the perps -- maybe turn over information without a search warrant?
Nearly 10 percent of the 900 students at Charlestown High have been victimized, Bledsoe said. Students targeted on the Facebook pages say they have been taunted and laughed at by classmates.
Why do we have this rule? "For the same reason we should be able to use the phone or send an e-mail without worrying that the government will access it without probable cause," Bankston said. "We live in a society that allows us to take advantage of technology, and use it privately, without worrying about government invasion." That seems pretty clear and, depending on your politics, of course, probably sounds like a good thing. But Bankston says that courts haven't actually ruled yet on how the protection of user content in ECPA applies to social network sites. There's a pro-privacy ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, holding that the pager company Arch Wireless shouldn't have turned over the text messages of a cop to his employer. (Another aspect of the case, City of Ontario v. Quon, is on appeal to the Supreme Court.) But sites like Facebook, of course, are different. There are the messages you send to one other person on Facebook, the posts that all of your friends can see, and the posts or pages that you make public.Minnesota dipped its big toe in all of this a few years ago when the Legislature required school districts to develop a policy on cyberbullying. But it gave no guidance to the districts on how they can police the actions of kids who often are posting offensive material from the comfort of their bedrooms.
As a former Gustie, it strikes me as wishful thinking that some folks pretend that heavy drinking and days like Case Day don't exist. I'm not sure what the "wrong idea" is about Gustavus, since the truth is that Case Day is real, and controversial.
Is it honest to make parents think that there is not a culture of heavy drinking at GAC? I don't know how much it compares to other liberal arts schools in MN, but we used to say that there were three things to do in St. Peter in the winter:
1. Drink.
2. Watch movies.
3. Drink & watch movies.
Having an article in the Weekly about it and (once again) raising the issue is a good thing. It's sad that folks think that pretending it doesn't exist for the sake of faking out prospective parents is a better course of action than acknowledging reality and dealing with it.
to echo teej's comment, heaven forbid an article in the student paper might inspire a parent to have a conversation about excessive drinking with their kid who's about to leave for college.
re: #3, bullying, Amazingly we're seeing this problem with our 3 yr old at daycare. Some of the older kids are teasing some of the younger kids (like ours) by derisively calling them names like 'baby'. This is not the kind of problem I expect to need to deal with for a preschooler. And on the one hand, I don't want to overreact as a parent, but on the other, why does the daycare provider tolerate such behavior? And how do I drive the lesson home for my 3 yr old that some people are jerks [edited for a family site], and sometimes you have to decide to ignore people that are trying to make you feel bad?
The nano-scale video is excellent.
A quick plug for the Science Museum of Minnesota.
On Saturday April 3, 2010 SMM will be hosting it's annual "Nano Days" event. Nano Days run from 3/27-4/3 this year. From 1-4 PM on 4/3 there will be hands on experiments and presentations associated with Nano scale science.
More info at: http://www.smm.org/nanodays
If you want to learn more about what you saw in the video many of those topics will be covered in the experiments and presentations.
[Disclaimer: I volunteer at the Science Museum and have been part of Nano Days for the last few years during my regular shifts in the Experiment Gallery.]
| April 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |