News Cut

News Cut: April 22, 2010 Archive

Five by 8 - 4/22/10: The real story behind the National Day of Prayer

Posted at 6:30 AM on April 22, 2010 by Bob Collins (8 Comments)
Filed under: Five by 8

This morning at 9, I'll be live-blogging MPR's Midmorning show on trust (or not) in government. I'll be in the studio and relaying some of your more insightful comments. Look for the blog post to begin around 8:45.

1) I generally try to stay away from writing about Michele Bachmann. There are a million different bloggers in the Twin Cities who make a living doing it, but she's taken on the cause of the National Day of Prayer "controversy" and since I was one of the few bloggers who covered the federal court decision in Wisconsin striking it down, I'll jump in, just so an intelligent discussion can be based on facts. After that, you're all on your own.

"It was never the intent of the Founding Fathers for faith, religion, and God to be stricken from public life as liberals are working so hard to do today," Bachmann said in one of her e-mails yesterday. "This court decision could not be more misguided and has simply no constitutional backing, as our founding document secured for all of us the right to pray. The American people would want it no other way."

Bachmann hasn't read the decision and doesn't understand it. There was nothing -- let's repeat that: nothing -- in the judge's decision that infringes on anyone's right to pray. Nothing prevents you, me, or the 1927 Yankees from praying or participating in a private National Day of Prayer. The question, however, is whether the government is, essentially, establishing or endorsing a religion by calling for a national day to pray. In other words: is the government sponsoring a religion in doing so?

There is, a casual reading of the U.S. Constitution will show, a constitutional backing for that decision. Whether it will stand up to appeal (my money is on "not") is another story, but clearly the Founding Fathers have something to say on government establishing a religion.

Let's consider what the federal judge in Wisconsin wrote:

"I understand that many may disagree with that conclusion and some may even view it as a criticism of prayer or those who pray. That is unfortunate. A determination that the government may not endorse a religious message is not a determination that the message itself is harmful, unimportant or undeserving of dissemination. Rather, it is part of the effort 'to carry out the Founders' plan of preserving religious liberty to the fullest extent possible in a pluralistic society.' "

In other words: It's not the role of government to tell you to pray. That's something that you get to decide for yourself. To suggest the Constitution does not provide guidance on this general question, is to neuter all other arguments about the role of the individual in our society.

These sorts of things are, obviously, low-hanging fruit for politicians, but there's an intellectual discussion to be had about this important question, were people in America still to place a high value on discussions that start with facts.

By the way, President Obama was the defendant in this particular case.

2) Several other states this week are finding out what Minnesota found out a few months ago: People are anxious to get free money to buy new appliances. The millions of dollars Minnesota distributed in its energy-efficient appliance rebate program was claimed quickly.

In Arizona this month, the money was all claimed in three hours. Massachusetts begins its program today. Florida, Maryland, and California are also just getting around to opening up the phone lines and websites.

The program, at least in Minnesota, was segregated by type of appliance and once people reserve the rebates, they got 30 days to buy their appliance and recycle the old one. So many people tried to get the cash, the state created a waiting list. Maybe those people will get a chance to get some of the money; maybe not. In Minnesota, it's looking like maybe not.

Here's the latest from Nicole Garrison-Sprenger, the communications director at the Minnesota Department of Commerce, whom I asked this week about the status of the effort:

For clothes washers and dishwashers, customers were asked to self-certify that they had indeed recycled their previous appliance. As far as the freezers and refrigerator rebates are concerned - based on the information that we have received from consumers to date, approximately 93.5% of the freezers rebates and 96.1% of the refrigerator rebates have been issued to customers that both purchased an ENERGY STAR qualified appliance and recycled their old appliance. So far, no waiting list customers have received rebates. On May 1st the rebate fulfillment contractor will begin processing rebate applications that have been received from customers on the waiting list.


3) Somehow, this one has got to end up at the Supreme Court, which this week considered whether campus groups can ban gays and lesbians. This issue is bigger: Softball. Specifically, how gay does a team have to be, to compete in the gay softball world series.

The story in the San Francisco Chronicle, reads like it could've come out of The Onion.


But another team, the Atlanta Mudcats, which had lost to D2 in a semifinal game, complained that the San Francisco team had too many straights.

D2 ultimately lost the championship to a team from Los Angeles. Afterward, Apilado, Charles and Russ were called separately into a conference room in front of 25 people for a hearing to determine whether they were heterosexual or gay, the suit said.

They were asked "very intrusive, sexual questions," including what their sexual interests and preferences were, Suzanne Thomas, a Seattle attorney for the plaintiffs, said Wednesday.

Charles, who was D2's manager, asked whether he could say he was bisexual and was told, "This is the Gay World Series, not the Bisexual World Series," the suit said.

4) So, it's Earth Day!

Earth Day has always had this subtext that's been adopted since by every other issue -- it's the tree-hugging liberals vs. the keep-your-nose-out-of-my-business conservatives.
But way back when, it was a little simpler. We didn't want to be pigs; we just didn't know any better.

Consider this from Stephanie Hemphill's story today:

Those early Earth Days probably spawned at least one generation horrified by litter, but a recent Gallup poll showed Americans are no more environmentally friendly in their actions today than they were 10 years ago. And they're more likely to reduce energy use, for instance, to save money, not to help the planet.

Maybe environmentalism is stuck in neutral, but it still changed a culture. It was back in 1970. I worked at McDonald's. "Lot and liners!" the boss would yell at the kid (usually me) who was goofing off. It meant, "go pick up the parking lot and empty the trash cans." There were no lobbies at McDonald's then. You sat in your car, ate your food, and then threw all the trash out the window. Nobody thought twice about it, especially the guy who would say, "How's business? Picking up?" That one still gets me.

If you didn't sit in the lot, you'd eat on your way home, and throw the trash out the window. We did the same with our air and our water. We were pigs. We just didn't realize it. That ad above, a picture of the earth taken from man's first flight to the moon, and Earth Day helped turn that around.

For the record, environmentalism didn't start on Earth Day. Here's proof from 1966:

letter_sentinel.jpg

We didn't, as Stephanie suggests, stop pitching McDonald's litter out the window because we wanted to save the planet. We did it because we realized it was stupid, and we didn't want to be pigs. Also because gas stations handed out bags to put in your car to hold your trash. Plastic bags.

Every now and then, some young person will tell me, "You Baby Boomers sure ruined the world for my generation." Maybe. But we also changed a culture. We didn't just get others to change. We changed ourselves.And if things haven't changed much in the last 10 years, that one's on you. We stepped up. A little bit.

5) What is Marketplace trying to tell us when it provides a segment on beating casinos at the blackjack game?

Bonus:

TODAY'S QUESTION

Today is Earth Day, according to a tradition established in 1970 to focus attention on the environment. Does Earth Day matter?

WHAT WE'RE DOING

Midmorning (9-11 a.m.) - First hour: Low trust in government: are Americans wired to be skeptical? A new study by the Pew Center sparks a debate on the role of trust and mistrust in American political life. Less than a quarter of Americans polled say they trust their government. Some experts say people in this country rarely express confidence in Congress and the executive branch. Others note a disturbing trend of increased polarization, in government and among voters.

Second hour: A new study finds 75 percent of teens own cell phones and prefer using them to text rather than talk. And e-mail? That's for parents. Internet researcher Lee Rainie talks about how teens' use of technology has changed.

Midday (11 a.m. - 1 p.m.) - First hour: The "dean" of Minnesota's environmentalists, Chuck Dayton, marks the 40th anniversary of Earth Day.

Second hour: A documentary about sex offenders, titled "No Brother of Mine."

Talk of the Nation (1-3 p.m.) - First hour: Marc Ambinder is the politics editor of The Atlantic, and at one time, was clinically obese. He suffered from sleep apnea and severe diabetes, and his weight so troubled him that he had trouble looking people in the eye. Now, Marc Ambinder reports on the country's long -- and so far unsuccessful -- war against obesity.

Second hour: After the first Gulf War, U.S. treatment of men captured on the battlefield drew praise as model treatment of prisoners of war. But after the second war in Iraq, allegations of torture and war crimes. Now, a new history puts U.S. policy in perspective, from the revolutionary war to Guantanamo Bay.

All Things Considered (3-6:30 p.m.) - MPR's Rupa Shenoy goes inside the prison that holds many of Minnesota's sex offenders who've been civilly committed. The ACLU is suing over conditions in the facility. The issue is whether the state is providing the treatment that rehabilitation requires.

A new study of wastewater treatment plants in Minnesota finds widespread low concentrations of pharmaceuticals. It's the most comprehensive study of a variety of chemical compounds coming from municipal sewage plants. It confirms widespread water contamination from human medications and antibiotics. Dan Gunderson will have the story.

An improv performance based on a website about things people hear in the Mill City? That's what's happening Thursday night. In Euan Kerr's story, performers explain how it works.

(8 Comments)

Live-blogging Midmorning: The people and their government

Posted at 8:45 AM on April 22, 2010 by Bob Collins (20 Comments)
Filed under: Politics

A new study by the Pew Center sparks a debate on the role of trust and mistrust in American political life. Less than a quarter of Americans polled say they trust their government. Some experts say people in this country rarely express confidence in Congress and the executive branch. Others note a disturbing trend of increased polarization in government and among voters.

Guests
Paul Gronke: Associate professor of political science at Reed College and co-author of "The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions."
William Galston: Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution and co-author of "Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do About It." Galston served in the Clinton administration as executive director of the National Commission on Civic Renewal.

(20 Comments)

Politics makes strange co-workers

Posted at 11:15 AM on April 22, 2010 by Bob Collins
Filed under: Politics

There's quite a workplace cocktail being mixed in St. Louis County.

Mark Rubin, an assistant county prosecutor, is announcing today he's running for St. Louis County attorney. That means he has to run against Melanie Ford, the current county attorney who is also Rubin's boss.

How does one do that and keep one's job? I'll try to find out later today.

Rubin is making the announcement at news conferences this afternoon in Virginia and Duluth.

In 2006, Ford beat a 28-year incumbent by just 88 votes out of more than 80,000 that were cast.

National Day of Prayer fight just beginning

Posted at 11:53 AM on April 22, 2010 by Bob Collins (5 Comments)
Filed under: Crime and Justice

The Justice Department says it's going to fight for a National Day of Prayer. Today, it filed a notice that it will appeal a federal judge's ruling that declaring a National Day of Prayer constitutes a violation of the separation of church and state.

Notice of Appeal Natl Day of Prayer

I also now have the actual court ruling from the federal judge in Wisconsin. You can read it here.

(5 Comments)

Live-blogging: Are Muslims unfairly criticized?

Posted at 12:10 PM on April 22, 2010 by Bob Collins (5 Comments)
Filed under: Religion

A radical Muslim group has allegedly threatened violence against the creators of South Park because of an episode that insulted the prophet Muhammad.


In the episode, the children meet Tom Cruise at a chocolate factory where he is packing bundles of fudge into boxes. They ask him why he's "packing fudge", which angers Cruise and leads him to bring a lawsuit against South Park. The only way that Cruise will drop the suit is if the town brings the Prophet Muhammad to South Park.

The whole point of the show is to lampoon the double standards applied to Islam and other religions in the media. There is a scene involving the "Super Best Friends", that features every religious figure acting as super heroes, including Buddha, who does lines of cocaine on a table as Jesus is speaking. For the scenes of Muhammad, the image is blacked out by a large "censored" graphic.

Eventually, Muhammad agrees to appear in South Park in a bear mascot costume so as not to offend Muslims.

The episode has been removed from YouTube, apparently because of copyright violations.

Closer to home, a Muslim civil rights group has criticized schools in the St. Cloud area for not reacting to racism there.

The BBC's World Have Your Say program has dedicated its international call-in program today to the question of whether Muslims are "always being attacked."

Here's an example of what people are saying:

Bahrain : Like Japanese in World War II, Muslims are being branded as a target. We are not attributed for any kind of innovation or forward thinking. When people criticize us, we have no rebuttal.

Texas:
It's hard to hear what people are saying about us, it's free speech. It's not something Muslims are used to but Muslims in the West are getting more comfortable with it.

Oregon: Trying to secularize Muslims won't help them.

Ohio: I used to be a critic of the faith, now I just don't care.

Trinidad: I'm not so concerned. One feels they are trying to set the agenda for liberal societies in which they live, which is something they wouldn't be able to do in any Mideast country.

Nigeria: There seems to be a general impression that there is a certain propensity for violence and the threat of it when it comes to that particular faith. Consider the flurry over the Catholic Church. No one has heard of threats against the parish priest. We take it for granted that we can say anything we want to about the Catholic faith. In the media there is self-censorship when it comes to Islam.

(A guest responded that that was an "attack." "You've used the term 'attack,' the gentleman in Nigeria responded. It's not an 'attack,' it's a 'criticism.' I'm not attacking anybody.)

Another guest says "there are two thugs in New York who put a statement about South Park up, and people think they speak for all Muslims. Muslims have spoken about this by not speaking about this (South Park) for the last 14 years."

Canada: Is the problem here South Park, or a culture that responds with death threats whenever there's something they disagree with?

(Guest: "If there's 100 Muslims and 99 of them love South Park, you're not going to hear from any of the 99. Our crazies get more attention.")

Jamaica: If there's any faith that's always being ridiculed, it's Christianity.

(5 Comments)

No miracles at Moose Lake

Posted at 4:07 PM on April 22, 2010 by Bob Collins (17 Comments)
Filed under: Crime and Justice, Health

MPR's Rupa Shenoy takes the latest look at the sex offender treatment/prison in Moose Lake, which is expected to get more business in the coming years as the state sends sex offenders to "treatment" after they serve their prison sentences. Only there's very little treatment going on and no way for the "patients" to get out.

In her story today, Shenoy, notes that 90 percent of the people in Moose Lake, don't undergo treatment:

Among them is Wallace Beaulieu. He was in pre-treatment therapy at Moose Lake but stopped participating.

"Anybody can say they're providing treatment, but if you're never giving anybody the opportunity to be released, what's the treatment then?" asks Beaulieu, 38.

Beaulieu said he was convicted twice for a forced sexual encounter -- one of a woman, in 1990, and 1992, a teenage girl. He said he spent four years in prison and was released in 1996.

Beaulieu said he did not register as a sex offender and was sent back to prison. When he finished that sentence, a Cass County judge ruled he was still a danger to the community and civilly committed him.

Beaulieu complains that Moose Lake is designed not to release patients.

"The treatment program right now is so vague," Beaulieu said. "They don't really talk about any sex offender issues that a person should be addressing.

It's a complaint that isn't new, and one that raged in the '90s when the state Supreme Court ruled that the law that keeps people locked up after their sentences was unconstitutional because the burden for proving the offenders didn't belong in the "treatment facility" rested with the offenders. They couldn't prove it, because they would have to be released to prove they weren't a threat to the community.

The Legislature changed the provisions under which "sexual psychopaths" are locked up after one came close to being released. The law shifted the burden to the state. It hasn't been much of a burden, however. Nobody has ever been released from the Moose Lake facility.

And for the most part, few people care. The only time the issue of Minnesota's sexual psychopath law comes up, are times like last October, when a reporter found out the "patients" got to watch big-screen TVs.

"It's questionable whether these men are rehabilitatable with the current modalities of treatment," Michael Farnsworth, a psychiatrist and former medical director for the Department of Human Services, told All Things Considered host Tom Crann at the time. "These are men who've had a long history... of dangerous sexual behavior. It's like taking people who are in the final stages of a terminal disease, placing them in an intensive care unit, providing millions worth of treatment, and expecting them to recover. Most of these men will not fully recover."

(17 Comments)
April 2010
S M T W T F S
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  


Master Archive

MPR News
Radio

Listen Now

On Air

The Story

Other Radio Streams from MPR

Classical MPR
Radio Heartland

Services