News Cut

News Cut: November 17, 2009 Archive

Five at 8 -11/17/09: Our good side

Posted at 7:55 AM on November 17, 2009 by Bob Collins (3 Comments)

First, the future of news.

Now, then:

1) It's alive and it's beautiful. The European Space Agency's Rosetta spacecraft is on a mission for a close-up exploration of a comet on the outer edges of the solar system. But not before it does one last fly by of our favorite planet as it slingshots out of our reach. This week, it's sending back gorgeous images of our good side:

rosetta_earth.jpg

Do yourself a favor and click the image above for the original size for sighs. Find the latest images here, including an anti-cyclone over the South Pacific.

2) Locally Grown, the excellent Web site in Northfield, has a little more on yesterday's story about the privacy violations when a teacher publicizes test scores by posting them in the classroom. Writer Griff Wigley says he was contacted by the woman who lodged the initial complaint (whom he identifies) and received permission to post her letter to officials (which he did).

3) Sometimes stereotypes happen for a reason. Ambar Espinoza's story today about mobile homes -- trailer parks -- in rural Minnesota documents the two Minnesotas. In one, she reports, an owner had 20 black labs. One owner says it's tough to make things decent in his park "because the renters won't cooperate." A resident in one park says the water system pumped sand for several weeks this summer.

An expert on mobile home parks blames the notion that it's better to live in squalor than to be homeless:
"We saw post-Katrina that as a nation we are not concerned about whether or not people have access to what we think of as 'decent housing'," she said. "They are worried about the image of their community or the fact that it might attract lower income residents speaks to that concern, too."
The fact that rural Minnesota is invisible to most people probably doesn't help, either.

4) The experts at St. Cloud State are going to release a poll showing Barack Obama's job approval ratings today. They'll probably mirror the national poll from CBS, which were released this morning. There's been a swing -- a big swing -- in how he's handled the war in Afghanistan. But, of course, he's taken weeks to decide what the U.S. is supposed to do in the war it's apparently losing there, and he hasn't yet announced what that is. The poll surveyed 1,167. There are 304 million people in the U.S.

But, of course, it's all in the spin. An ABC poll characterizes the president's job approval rating as "durable." It indicates a job approval rating slightly higher than the CBS poll.

5) Skydiving without a parachute: Can it be done? Sure. The question is can you land and survive? "It is doable," thinks physicist and parachute researcher Jean Potvin at Saint Louis University in Missouri tells New Scientist.



Living on the edge. Discussion point: What would you do if you weren't afraid to do it?

Bonus: Must read. Daniel Cornell goes back to Vietnam to learn more about the place where his boyhood friend died.

TODAY'S QUESTION

During his current visit to Asia, President Obama has said that the United States does not fear a rising China and seeks stronger ties with the developing superpower. How can the United States and China best cooperate in world affairs?

WHAT WE'RE WORKING ON

Midmorning (9-11 a.m.) - First hour: A new study says about half of Americans would be willing to pay for the news they get online. The Boston Consulting Group study also found that people in other countries are much more willing to pay. How to pay for content is just one of many questions that dogs the news media as some try to figure out what the future holds.

Second hour: U.S. colleges are graduating as many scientists and engineers as ever, yet employers say they are facing a shortage. Midmorning looks into the motives behind their migration into other fields like finance and what incentives are necessary to keep scientists doing the work they were trained for.

Midday (11 a.m. - 1 p.m.) - First hour: NPR's Mara Liasson will be Midday's guest to talk about Sarah Palin's new book, out today. We'll discuss key issues, her level of support, the McCain campaign, and her future in GOP politics.

Second hour: A speech about global warming, by Lester Brown, author of "Plan B 4.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization." He spoke Monday at the University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute.

Talk of the Nation (1-3 p.m.) - First hour: Where's your next job going to come from?

Second hour: George Carlin chronicled his life in his act. Making fun of language, people, and institutions. But when it came time to write the story of that life, he enlisted the help of his friend Tony Hendra. The author talks about helping to write, and complete, George Carlin's memoir, "Last Words."

Breaking news: "Unfriend" is the word of the year. Carlin would hit that one a mile.

All Things Considered (3-6:30 p.m.) - Somewhat related. Euan Kerr profiles Aricka Okrent's new book. Okrent learned Esperanto and Klingon amongst other languages for her new book. We'll hear some samples

Environmental groups are challenging the rosy record of Wisconsin's Flambeau mine, held by some as example of successful precious metal mining. MPR's Bob Kelleher will have the story this afternoon.

Sarah Varney reports on why some states are doing better at distributing flu vaccine than others. And MPR's Lorna Benson assesses how Minnesota is doing. (3 Comments)

Mammogram panels?

Posted at 9:08 AM on November 17, 2009 by Bob Collins (11 Comments)
Filed under: Health

The timing couldn't possibly have been worse for the government to release new guidelines on when women should have mammograms to detect breast cancer early enough to save their lives -- right in the middle of the nation's health care debate over the role of government in health care decisions.

The guidelines, if you haven't heard, recommend women not have mammograms until age 50, instead of age 40, as most groups who research the issue suggest.

"There is no doubt that mammography screening in women in their 40s saves lives. To recommend that women abandon that is absolutely horrifying to me," Dr. David Dershaw, director of breast imaging at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center said.

So why did they? Dr. Otis Brawley of the American Cancer Society suggests cost is behind this:

The USPSTF says that screening 1,339 women in their 50s to save one life makes screening worthwhile in that age group. Yet USPSTF also says screening 1,904 women ages 40 to 49 in order to save one life is not worthwhile. The American Cancer Society feels that in both cases, the lifesaving benefits of screening outweigh any potential harms. Surveys of women show that they are aware of these limitations, and also place high value on detecting breast cancer early.

"With its new recommendations, the USPSTF is essentially telling women that mammography at age 40 to 49 saves lives; just not enough of them.

And what Brawley didn't say, Dr. Sanjay Gupta did. Gupta, who was Barack Obama's initial choice for surgeon general before he decided to stay at CNN, speculated today that once the government recommends guidelines for medical care, private insurance companies will be quick to stop covering anything else.

Not death panels, mamography panels. It's worth pointing out, perhaps, that the government's guidelines now match Canada.

But Susan Pisano, spokeswoman for American Health Insurance Plans, appears to dismiss the concerns:

"Most of our member companies look at [the task force's guidelines] as the standard. But if you are in your 40s and have a discussion about risk and benefits and your doctor gives you a referral slip, then that generally is going to be covered."

Still, the story does highlight the extent to which cost factors into health care decisions, even after the possibility a life being saved is recognized.

(11 Comments)

Should Sarah Palin have a platform?

Posted at 1:03 PM on November 17, 2009 by Bob Collins (5 Comments)
Filed under: Politics

MPR Midday featured a fascinating -- if slightly uncomfortable -- moment today when the question came up of whether news organizations who talk about Sarah Palin are being irresponsible.

The question also revealed that the Tim Pawlenty vs. Sarah Palin camps may already be forming.

National Public Radio national political correspondent Mara Liasson was Gary Eichten's guest to talk about Palin's new book, "Going Rogue: An American Life."

It started when a caller to the show made this point:

"Aren't you by giving this person and this book the kind of coverage that you're giving right now on this program and consulting a national correspondent and so on, aren't you lending a cachet to this sort of mental lightweight that she doesn't deserve? We have... there are very good people on all sides of issues -- qualified people; Tim Pawlenty is one of them. Tim Pawlenty is a guy I don't agree with very often, but he's served many terms in office. He's knowledgeable. He's well spoken. He's well traveled. He understands gray matters and complicated issues. This person does not deserve a national spotlight or the limelight. This is showbiz. This is not how we need to be conducting national politics."

It brings up an interesting question: Do listeners learn more by hearing about people in the news? Or should it be filtered and should someone decide which political players -- we're not seriously arguing that Palin isn't a political player, right? -- deserve to be heard? Are we interested only in hearing our own views reflected back at us?

It's bait that Eichten usually doesn't take. And he didn't.

"Well, obviously Willie is not going to be supporting Sarah Palin."

But Mara Liasson specializes in this sort of thing:


"Well, no, but that's a good question for you. By doing this aren't you giving her a platform... by doing an hour-long show about her?"

Eichten still didn't take the bait:


"No, I'm quizzing a national political correspondent... who covers national politics why Sarah Palin is such a polarizing and interesting figure to America?"

The answer to the caller's question seems obvious. Palin is going to run for president, and Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com today explains why.

But the original point sets up an either/or scenario. You can either talk about Palin or you can talk about Pawlenty. To the extent that's true -- and for the most part, it's not -- the blame has to go to Pawlenty. He rejects most every request from Midday for an interview. The last time he accepted was April 13, 2009.

But both Pawlenty and Palin have similarities. Both claim not to be thinking about being president, even as the actions of both clearly suggest they are:

(5 Comments)

War and the single mother

Posted at 2:23 PM on November 17, 2009 by Bob Collins
Filed under: War

Should single mothers of young children be allowed to serve in the military and be deployed to war?

It's the case of Spc. Alexis Hutchinson, an Army cook and the mother of a 10-month old son in Georgia. She's refusing to deploy to Afghanistan because, she says, there's nobody to care for her child. She's afraid the Army will force her to put her son in foster care.

A spokesman for Hunter Army Airfield said the Army would not deploy a single parent who had nobody to care for his or her child.

According to the group, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, more than 40-percent of enlisted women have children, and more than 30,000 single mothers have deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.

The current operational tempo has created considerable pressure to change the Defense Department's maternity policy. According to the GAO, "about 10 percent of women in the military become pregnant each year, and 75,000 military offspring are younger than one," as of 2002. The military gives new mothers six weeks of maternity leave before they have to return to work or training. However, each service branch has its own post-birth deferment-from-deployment policy. The Army, which has the longest tours of duty at 12 months, gives women just 4 months to stay stateside with their newborns before deploying to the war zone, leaving little time to bond with or nurse
their infants. Other military branches grant longer stays and have shorter deployment lengths. For example, the Marines offer 6 month deferments and their tours average
7 months.

According to Maj. Gen. Gayle Pollock, former acting Army surgeon general, the Army should increase its maternity deferments to at least 8 months, with 12 months
being the most ideal: "We need to look at the fact that many women want to serve but they also want to be mothers.

It's a medical issue, it's a mental health issue. Your ability to bond with your children is...very important." Congress has also asked the Pentagon to fix the disparity that exists between the service branches, but no official action has been taken to date."

Charitable fallout

Posted at 3:04 PM on November 17, 2009 by Bob Collins (25 Comments)

Today is Give to the Max Day in Minnesota, an innovative -- and to be sure, worthwhile, idea whereby seed money from several august foundations is being used to match contributions from people donating online.

My colleague, Marianne Combs, has been looking at the idea with a very critical eye.

But as the day winds down -- and at last check, over $7 million has been donated -- she may have a few additional questions, like, "are the foundations happy where their money went?"

It turns out that the third-leading recipient of donations today (again, at last check. It's standing may not last) is Desiring God Ministries, the ministry of John Piper. You may recall his comments after a steeple was damaged in Minneapolis while nearby, Lutherans were debating whether to allow non-celibate homosexuals to be clergy.

The tornado in Minneapolis was a gentle but firm warning to the ELCA and all of us: Turn from the approval of sin. Turn from the promotion of behaviors that lead to destruction. Reaffirm the great Lutheran heritage of allegiance to the truth and authority of Scripture. Turn back from distorting the grace of God into sensuality. Rejoice in the pardon of the cross of Christ and its power to transform left and right wing sinners.

As the third-most leading recipient today, Piper is eligible for a "bonus" from the foundations.

Clearly the idea has led people to do what they likely wouldn't have done, today, but it provides a fascinating case study in how money can get directed to public policy efforts that many of these foundations would never have funded individually.

There's also a guilt-by-association danger in underwriting polarizing figures. For example, are you more or less likely to give to the United Way if you knew that some of your went to a ministry with which you do/don't agree?

(25 Comments)

Fresh Eye on the Radio: Homosexuality and abuse

Posted at 5:20 PM on November 17, 2009 by Bob Collins (1 Comments)

A preliminary report commissioned by the nation's Roman Catholic bishops on the roots of the clergy sex abuse scandal found no evidence that gay priests are more likely than heterosexual clergy to molest children, the lead authors of the study said Tuesday.

And tales from the dog-training world.

(1 Comments)
November 2009
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          


Master Archive

MPR News
Radio

Listen Now

Other Radio Streams from MPR

Classical MPR
Radio Heartland

Services