News Cut

What killed the bees?

Posted at 12:03 PM on October 19, 2009 by Bob Collins (2 Comments)
Filed under: Science

honeybee_arboretum.jpg

Don't be saying you're not interested in what has caused the huge die-off of the bee population. A third of the total human diet depends on the critters.

Now, then: Discover Magazine reports we now know what has caused a third of all commercial honeybees to die: Commercial bee agriculture. Bee inbreeding, basically. They once were a hardy sort, with the queen adapting to the variety of male drones with which she would breed.


All that began to change in the early 20th century, when farms and orchards started enlisting honeybees to pollinate their crops. Bees that were adapted to harvesting pollen from a variety of plants suddenly spent a month or more at a time surrounded by nothing but almond or apple trees. Farmers eager to increase their crop yields turned to commercial beekeepers, who offered up massive wooden hives stocked with queen bees genetically selected to produce colonies of good pollinators. These breeding practices slashed the genetic variety that helps any species survive infections, chemicals, and other unforeseen threats.

Ironically, the cause turns out to be the very sort of person who raised the alarm in the first place.

Bee experts are trying to adopt practices that lead bees to lead a more natural life. "Bees have been doing this for 80 million years," one says. "All we have to do is get out of their way."


Comments (2)

Bob,

Honeybees are not a native species to North America. They were introduced in the 1600s.
So bees have not been doing this in America for 80 million years, but rather only 4 or 5 hundred.

In the meantime, humans over-promotion of this one type of bee imported from Europe has displaced the native bees that should be pollinating our food -- 4,000 native species in the United States, and 120 native to Minnesota.
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/volunteer/julaug09/thisissue.html

Do we really need so much honey production in the state at such a huge environmental cost?

Or is it okay if nature finds a way to limit over-feeding of a single species?

Posted by Preston Wright | October 19, 2009 1:32 PM


I don't think the gentleman was suggesting they've been doing it *in North America* for 80 million years.

I think he also might have been using hyperbole.

Posted by Bob Collins | October 19, 2009 1:55 PM


Post a comment

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>
Fields marked with * are required.


Comment Preview appears above this form upon pressing the "preview" button. Edit your comment and press "preview" again, until you are satisfied with your comment.

Your comment may not appear on the blog until several minutes after it was submitted.

October 2009
S M T W T F S
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31


Master Archive

MPR News
Radio

Listen Now

On Air

Midday

Other Radio Streams from MPR

Classical MPR
Radio Heartland

Services

Become a Sponsor