Gov. Pawlenty today proposed an economic incentive plan for "green businesses" in Minnesota, but he invoked a component of the plan that may make the DFL see red in the coming session: JOBZ, Pawlenty's program that aimed to bring some business to the most distressed areas of the state.
Part of the governor's program would provide tax breaks -- $3.65 million worth immediately and another $82 million after his term is up in 2011.
Qualifying renewable-energy projects would receive an array of tax breaks in a green version of the Job Opportunity Building Zones program. JOBZ is designed to spur job growth in economically distressed regions of Minnesota. Green JOBZ would be open to qualifying renewable energy businesses anywhere in the state for up to 12 years, costing the state $3.65 million in the 2010-11 budget years and another $6.6 million in 2012-13.
But JOBZ has some problems, according to a report earlier this year from the Office of the Legislative Auditor.
Here were the major points:
The Department of Employment and Economic Development last month moved to change the program in response to the criticism. But from the sound of things today, some DFLers aren't enthusiastic about funneling tax credits via the program. "I think there are better ways to spend $4 million," said Rep. Tim Mahoney, chair of the Biosciences and Emerging Technology Committee in the House..
Update 2:46 p.m. The Green Jobs Task Force co-chair, Rep. Jeremy Kalin, a DFLer, sounded an upbeat note:
On a snowy and blustery Friday afternoon, more than 4 dozen Minnesotans attended the Attracting Green Jobs sub-committee meeting in Morris. On a cold Monday morning, nearly 100 people attended another sub-committee meeting at the Minneapolis Urban League. Minnesotans are engaged and looking for leadership, and they expect the legislature and the Governor to work together to turn our economy around as fast as possible.
The MN NextGen Energy Board recently issued $3 million in grants to eight projects in the state. If only ONE pans out, it will be well worth the investment.
Piggyback on fed credits for green tech that reward consumers for improving their energy efficiency. For instance, solar panel & foam insulation installations create local jobs that can't be outsourced. They save consumers money & help the envornment by lowering energy demand.
You know, it's kind of funny to keep hearing the state talk about going green on energy. In Woodbury right now, there's a ridiculous amount of time being spent trying to decide whether the new high school -- which sits in a vast open field -- can put in a windmill for its energy. The neighbors, you know.
It'd be interesting to explore the regulatory side of this -- and how easy-- or difficult -- the mishmash of current state and local zoning and other siting requirements are toward creating a demand for green tools.
I just keep wondering, how Maple Grove allowed a windmill to go up. But now that it has that little one, how long till more get added?
My kids love seeing the Maple Grove windmill run, days that are not windy are a bummer for them.
That Maple Grove windmill may do more to bring the industry to the TC than anything else. Again in the case of Woodbury, I know the city is organizing a visit to go see it and talk to the officials there.
But what if a homeowner wanted to put one up? Or solar panels? In some of these cities, we can't even put up clotheslines.
Energy Independence needs to be included in the realm of our economic issues. Our dependence on foreign oil impacts every aspect of our society and economy. This past year is a testimony to that fact. Jeff Wilson has a great new book out called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence NOW. I highly recommend this book to anyone who is worried about our economy and interested in seeing our country energy independent. www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com