Mum's the word

Posted at 2:30 PM on October 17, 2008 by Bob Collins (3 Comments)
Filed under: Politics

A national election in Canada this week went virtually unnoticed in the United States. And now a controversy is brewing that also is going unnoticed in the United States: Blogs and social networking sites posted election results before the polls in Western Canada closed.

In Canada, that's illegal. Section 329 of the Canada Elections Act bans the transmission of election results from any electoral district where polls have closed to districts where the polls are still open, according to the CBC.

People in the western part of the U.S., perhaps, can sympathize. Elections are usually over by the time the polls close. The winner has -- usually -- been declared and people don't bother voting. Occasionally there is a call for legislation similar to Canada's.

But the policy in Canada doesn't really work, if the goal is to get people to vote. Only 59% of registered Canadians voted. Part of that is another aspect of the law that opens polling places for only 12 hours.

In an editorial this week, the National Post noted that the system is so byzantine that no newspaper carried a photo of Stephen Harper accepting his re-election victory.

The result was absurd: On the National Post's blogs, posters were forced to censor themselves about riding results that they (and most of their readers) already knew about. The same was true on television. Inevitably, people slipped up: In fact, we observed such slip-ups on all the major networks. In some cases, the spectacle was farcical, with producers desperately trying to bleep out verboten comments while permitting more general analysis.

We confess to having a self-interested motive in opposing Section 329. The people who abide by it (or try to, at least) are established journalists such as ourselves. Meanwhile, on privately run blogs, anything goes. The law thereby ensures that the least responsible outlets attract the greatest number of visitors.

Theoretically, anyone in the U.S. with a Facebook or Twitter account could've provided the clandestine information to their Canadian friends. But what are the odds an American with a Facebook or Twitter account knew about an election in Canada?

---

Comments (3)

Where is "Canada" ?

Posted by Ivan | October 17, 2008 2:59 PM

---

As It Happens Rocks!

As a regular AIH listener, I do get news of CA, but your point ( who even knew?) is spot on.

Posted by Bonnie | October 17, 2008 4:07 PM

---

Isn't one answer to have all the voting in the country start at one time and end at one time? So the voting could go on for 18 hours, then stop. That could accommodate multiple time zones. In Pony Express days voting could be staggered by time zone but it's not practical now.

Posted by sm | October 17, 2008 4:58 PM

---

Post a comment

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>
Fields marked with * are required.

Name*:

E-mail Address*:

URL:

Remember personal info?

Comments*:

Comment Preview appears above this form upon pressing the "preview" button. Edit your comment and press "preview" again, until you are satisfied with your comment.

Your comment may not appear on the blog until several minutes after it was submitted.

• E-mail this page
• Print this page
• Save to Delicious
• Submit to Digg
• Share this

Services

• Hourly Newscast
• HD Radio
• iPhone App / Mobile
• E-mail newsletters
• RSS feeds
• Podcasts
• Submit your photos
• Videos
• Weather
• Most e-mailed stories

Become a Sponsor