Posted at 8:46 AM on September 30, 2008
by Bob Collins
(0 Comments)
Filed under: Politics
Minnesota is one of the nation's leaders when it comes to elections. More of its citizens vote than just about any other state, and it leads the nation in voter registration, thanks in part to the same-day registration process. Recently, Secretary of State Mark Ritchie said the state is on pace for an 80-percent turnout in the coming election.
Ohio has taken a page from Minnesota, and then some. Ohio started voting today after a state court (dominated by Republicans) rule that newly registered voters can register and then vote by absentee ballot on the same day. That day is today.
Republicans hate the idea. Democrats love it because they can get college kids (who lean Democrat) to register and vote with a minimum amount of effort.
Last month I blogged about a day-long conference on voting systems and the one message I took away was that young people have the least amount of patience when it comes to voting. if there are long lines, or problems with voting machines, the younger age group will turn around and go home.
Julia Kramer, 19, a Case Western Reserve University freshman from New York City and an Obama volunteer, told the Associated Press she's been trying to get out-of-state students to change their registration to Ohio. "A lot of people are really attached to their hometowns," Kramer said. "It's hard to explain to people that your vote (in New York) won't count as much."
Both Obama and McCain officials say they're prepared to take advantage of the early-voting law in Ohio. And NPR's Robert Smith reported that the voters in Ohio are being barraged with political ads now that voting has opened.
As for you, Minnesota, if you don't want to go through the Election Day hassle of registering, you have to register by October 14.
Posted at 11:21 AM on September 30, 2008
by Bob Collins
(22 Comments)
Filed under: Economy
The Web site, The Consumerist, has put together a list of 10 things to expect from "the new post-apocalyptic economy."
Number 1 is worth considering: A much less leveraged economy -- Cash will be the thing to have.
What would things look like if we have to pay cash for everything, once credit cards dry up (maybe they'd eliminate the grace period and start charging a finance charge from first dollar)?
I've got two, and you can add yours in the comments section.
-1- More lottery ticket sales, and sales of car air fresheners and other junk. Why? Pay at the Pump, baby. It'd be history. You'll have to actually go inside the convenience store/gas station and wait in a long line of other people. From boredom, you'll start picking up little trinkets and trashy things that the stores know you'll buy on impulse. They're smarter than we are. Oh, and there'll still be people who want to pay with a check who won't have filled any of it out while standing in line.
-2- No mail today? If there's no credit cards, there'll be no more credit card mailings. I got four yesterday, alone. State Farm offered me 0% on balance transfers until July 2009. Hey, here's an idea, bailout voters in Congress, stick a provision in that puppy when you revote this week that forces credit card solicitors to put the true cost of this scam right on the front page. Outlaw asterisks.
Capitol One (how does Capitol One have any money after the cost of sending at least three credit card solicitations a week to every American and every household pet?) offered 0% on purchases and transfers until 2010.*.
Life after credit, what's it look like? Be funny, now, we all need a good laugh.
Posted at 1:23 PM on September 30, 2008
by Bob Collins
(4 Comments)
Filed under: Economy, Energy
According to Twin Cities Gas Prices, the average price of a gallon of regular gas this afternoon is $3.36. Does it feel like a bargain to you compared to what it was a few weeks ago?
How about $3.12? Would it make you start whistling Happy Days Are Here Again?
3.12, for the record, was the price of a gallon of gasoline when the first installment of the increased Minnesota state gas tax went into effect last spring. Minnesotans responded by pumping fewer gallons in April than they did in March.
Tomorrow, the other shoe drops when the gas tax goes up another 3 cents. Last week, at a transportation forum in Worthington, Margaret Donahoe, executive director of The Transportation Alliance, said the financial impact of a two-car family will be about $100 a year
And, the Worthington Daily Globe, the "us against them" atmosphere that has surrounded transportation funding debates in the state for years, hasn't melted...
... commented Rep. Doug Magnus, rural Minnesotans are paying more than those in the metro area. He cited numbers indicating that southwest Minnesotans will pay an estimated $216 per capita in gasoline and special fuel taxes by 2011, while the Twin Cities metropolitan area faces $147 per capita for the same year.
A seven-member panel of politicians and candidates said they were grateful to be taking the first steps in the form of Chapter 152, but emphasized the importance of finding more funding for the state's infrastructure.
"When my family moved here in 1957 all the roads in Iowa were narrow and the roads in Minnesota were wide," said Al Kruse, a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in District 21A, "In the last 50 years everyone else has moved ahead and Minnesota has remained stagnant. Our infrastructure is falling farther and farther behind. (Fixing infrastructure is) important for our economic survival. That's just to survive. To thrive we need four-lanes. You see what happens around a four-lane highway -- there's economic development there."
Republicans thought the gas tax issue would anger people enough to carry over at the polls. But that was before overnight swings of 30 to 40 cents a gallon made 2 or 3 cent jumps seem like small potatoes.
With the increasing price of energy, the gas tax funding mechanism faces the same pressures the state's tobacco tax -- or fee -- presents. On the one hand, market forces or the state itself are encouraging people not to smoke -- or drive -- and on the other hand, the state's financial health depends on them doing both.
At least where the price of gasoline is concerned, Minnesotans will have plenty of incentive to cut back. T. Boone Pickens predicted this morning that a barrel of gasoline will be back close to $150 within a year.
And 3 cents a gallon will seem like small potatoes again.
Posted at 2:59 PM on September 30, 2008
by Bob Collins
(2 Comments)
Filed under: Economy
Is a perfect storm about to swamp the boats of graduating college seniors? A study from the Accounts Receivable Management industry suggests so.
Credit card operations are the biggest money-makers for banks and as a story recently by MPR's Martin Moylan pointed out, banks are working the college market hard. Meanwhile, a significant number of students are using credit cards to pay for tuition, which is rising faster than the rate of inflation.
There's plenty of risk in doing so, according to the Kaulkin Ginsberg Company report. It says 31 percent of college students polled said they didn't worry about debt, because they could pay back outstanding balances once out of school and earning a regular paycheck. Twenty-three percent chose to ignore overdraft penalties and the prospect of months of repaying a debt for a moment of fun.
Yeah, about that job thing, students, there's something we need to tell you: there aren't any. According to the report, what few summer jobs were available for college students in the past, were taken instead by adults who picked up extra part-time work to help their own struggling finances. Last July alone, the report said, 308,000 individuals entered into the part-time work for this reason.
Higher tuition and associated costs, fewer jobs, and now the credit crunch. Over the summer, more than two dozen banks stopped private lending to students.
Up to now, about 10 percent of student borrowers depend on private loans. With major lenders tightening credit, the report suggests 1 in 4 college students will be putting college costs on a credit card and may find it very difficult to pay it back.
But the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators said in a campaign over the summer that "financial aid will be available to students. The credit crunch caused by troubles in the real estate lending industry has no effect on most financial aid including (but not limited to) Pell Grants, Federal Work Study, and education tax benefits."
That's not quite the case, according to a story this week in Time, which says since the summer of 2007, 137 lenders have stopped funding federal loans, and 33 have suspended private programs.
"Part of that had to do with a cut in federal subsidies, but part was directly related to the credit crunch -- issuers that pulled out tended to be those that packaged and resold loans, a market that has evaporated.
Students at community and technical colleges, especially institutions that are for-profit, are having the toughest time of it. The reason: those students are more likely to use private loans (whose credit standards have tightened), and lenders under profit pressure are less willing to write loans for shorter, one- and two-year programs -- especially at schools with historically high default rates."
"Last month, a student who was looking for a college loan qualified with a co-signer," a spokesman for JP Morgan Chase said. "A year ago that student, with a marginal credit history might have qualified on their own."
"Any sort of shortfall in their tuition they're going to have to make up either by borrowing from their parents or using their credit card as a bridge loan," Dimitri Michaud, who wrote the Kaulkin Gisberg report said. "I think the biggest pain will probably be in nondirect educational expenses; you might see students struggling with their room and board or how best to pay for their meal plans or books and supplies."
Posted at 6:23 PM on September 30, 2008
by Bob Collins
(3 Comments)
Filed under: Economy
This must be what bungee jumping is like. Way down, a little up, down more, up less. The Dow 30 on Tuesday jumped 485 points, a day after diving 777 points.
When the "financial meltdown" became public last Monday, the market plunged 540 points in the first two days of trading, then ended the week down only a couple hundred points.
Is it really worth getting all hot-and-bothered -- or giddy -- on a day-to-day basis?
On the first day of trading after September 11, the Dow dropped 684.81 points (at the time only the 14th worst decline ever). It went on to lose a total of 1,369 points that week, and got half of it back the next week. Within two months, the Dow was back to its previous 9/11 levels, and then some. All that worrying that it was the end of the world, and it wasn't even the end of the quarter.
After 9/11, the biggest one-day drop was February 27, 2007, a day when the Taliban tried to assassinate Dick Cheney. The Dow dropped 416 points. It snapped back 52 points the next day. It took a little over a month to return to the previous levels.
Here are the other big point losses
April 14, 2000 -617.78 . It went up 276 points the next day and blasted back to its previous level within 6 days.
October 27, 1997 -554.26. It regained 337 points the next day, and was back to its old self two weeks later.
August 31, 1998 -554.26. The market regained almost 300 points a day later, and reached its previous level two weeks later.
October 19, 1987 -508. It regained 288 points over the next two days, but it took 13 months to return to the level the market was at.
| September 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||