![]() |
< Olympic fakery - Part II | Main | The first to know >
The shifting political sands of energy
Posted at 10:59 AM on August 12, 2008
by Bob Collins
(6 Comments)
Filed under: Energy, Politics
One's antenna always should go up when a special interest group releases a poll that shows a result favorable to the special interest group. But a poll is a poll and today's comes from the American Petroleum Institute which reports its poll finds 58% of Minnesotans support "increased access" to oil and gas reserves (i.e. ANWR and coastal drilling). Twenty-percent of those people only somewhat support the idea.
Ninety-four percent of those surveyed are "concerned" about the price of gas. Five percent "aren't concerned at all."
The results are pretty much the same as a survey Quinnipiac took in Minnesota last month. In that survey, 59 percent of those surveyed said they support drilling for oil off the coasts. Half of those who said they supported drilling, said they have always held that view; that's a sign of the shifting political sand on the issue.
But in that same survey, 61 percent of those surveyed said they'd rather have politicians focus on alternative forms of energy, than drilling for oil.
Comments (6)
Hey, API!
Drill
Sales of largely renewable E85 are up +13% in Minnesota this year, even as gasoline sales decline -- leading to lower prices at the pump, less pollution, etc.
Posted by Bob Moffitt | August 12, 2008 3:38 PM
Drill THIS, rather...
Darn your ancient comment software, Collins.
Tell your bosses at MPR to pony up some cash for News Cut 2.0!!!
Posted by Bob Moffitt | August 12, 2008 3:41 PM
API's response: That's great! But why not drill too?
I think calling E85 "largely renewable" is a pretty big overstatement.
Posted by brian | August 12, 2008 4:36 PM
But I guess that isn't really what the post is about.
Posted by brian | August 12, 2008 4:38 PM
If there were the possibility of oil under the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, would you be in favor of drilling to yield oil 10 years from now?
Nancy Stier
Posted by Nancy Stier | August 13, 2008 7:19 AM
Nancy,
I hope you are not attempting to compare ANWR with the BWCA. There is no comparison whatsoever.
The first difference is size. The BWCA is a small part of Minnesota, ANWR is larger than Minnesota.
The second difference is geography.
The section of ANWR where drilling is proposed is nothing more than a vast flat white parking lot for 9 months of the year. The other three months, it's a vast flat green sponge.
By the way, there already is oil extraction in ANWR. The tribes have oil wells.
Posted by GregS | August 13, 2008 2:55 PM
Archives
August 2008 | ||||||
SU |
MO |
TU |
WE |
TH |
FR |
SA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
Recent Entries
- Minnesota health agency cracks salmonella mystery
- The week-in-review quiz
- How to survive at work when everyone else is getting laid off
- Questions and answers about the salmonella outbreak and flu
- Salmonella outbreak started months ago
- The last-minute nation
- What happens when the cameras stop rolling?
- Are the mayors dreaming of being governor?
- Graduation day
- Salmonella outbreak
Categories
- China
- Crime and Justice
- Difficult issues to talk about
- Economy
- Energy
- Geeks at play
- Guns
- Health
- Housing
- I-35W Bridge
- Icons
- Interesting surveys that don't mean anything
- Iraq
- Jesse
- Journalism
- Life
- Marketing and advertising
- Media
- Music
- Northwest Airlines
- Olympics
- Our busted bridges
- Pawlenty
- Politics
- Poverty
- Race
- Regional history
- Religion
- Schools
- Secrets
- Sports
- Tech
- The jobs we do
- The lessons of the Rogers tornado
- The political conventions
- The Quiz
- The things we do for fun
- Things that are puzzling
- War
- Weather
- Whacky things that say a lot about us
- Your money








