Posted at 12:00 PM on April 30, 2010
by Paul Tosto
(2 Comments)
MinnEcon note: My colleague Mike Caputo will soon launch a Minnesota Public Radio News page dedicated to online conversations on topics of the day. His goal: civil discussion that makes us all a little smarter.
Today, he shot me a note about wind power and the economy: How should Minnesota communities embracing wind power react to the news of big competition off the east coast?
Good question. Mike's site will be up in a couple weeks. But you can help him get the conversation rolling by posting some thoughts below or drop us a line directly.
Here's Mike's post:
Work is set to go in Albert Lea on building 122 wind turbines, a project to harness wind power for energy. The Bent Tree farm is one of several being proposed for the area.
Wind power debates are also rolling In Goodhue County with about four project pending there.
But now comes the news that the Obama administration has approved offshore wind turbines in the Atlantic to power the east coast.
This could threaten Midwest wind projects, like those in Albert Lea and Goodhue County, according to the Des Moines Register's Green Fields blog.
(O)ffshore Atlantic ocean wind energy poses a potential threat to the burgeoning wind development in Iowa, Minnesota and the Dakotas and those states' desire to export their surplus wind (hopefully at a profit) to more populous states east of the Mississippi River.That sets up this question: How should Minnesota communities embracing wind power react to the news of big competition off the east coast?
>Xcel ready to build wind farm in SW Minnesota
>Minnesota slips in wind energy rankings
>Counties look to wind power for energy, income
Posted at 1:25 PM on April 30, 2010
by Chris Farrell
(1 Comments)
Filed under: Housing & mortgages
From chief economics correspondent Chris Farrell
The first-time homebuyer and move-up tax credits expire today. (And the purchase has to be completed before July 1). The tax credit was expanded and extended past its original expiration date of November 30, 2009 to April 30th. It's about time.
The first time buyer credit was for up to $8,000 and the move-up credit could go as high as $6,500. The idea behind the credits was to boost sales. However, at best the credits may have helped brake the downward momentum of the housing market--if that.
To be sure, the housing market implosion was the epicenter of the Credit Crunch and Great Recession. The federal government directed enormous resources at the home market. Besides bailing out banks, it nationalized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, opened the lending spigot at the Federal Housing Administration, established a mortgage modification program for troubled homeowners, and passed the homebuyer tax credits. The Federal Reserve also embarked on a $1.25 trillion purchase of mortgage-backed securities in an effort to engineer lower mortgage rates. (It has also ended.)
Much of the recent gains in home prices is attributed to buyers making a deal before the credits expired. But those sales--which haven't been exactly sizzling--probably would have happened anyway. The credit's deadline simply moved them forward by a few months or maybe a year.
Worse, the policy was geared toward propping up home prices, which is perverse. Artificially holding prices at above-market levels harms new potential buyers, from young adults starting their own households to immigrants putting down stakes in the American Dream. The subsidies wrongly delayed the inevitable home market price adjustment to excess supply in many markets across the country.
The market shift to lower values would have been much quicker and fairer without the credit. The best policy in this case is let the market work.
Longer-term, the Administration and Congress should start the process of culling the U.S. tax code of the many tax provisions that favor housing. In a modern economy it makes no sense for homes to get preferable tax treatment over stocks and other investments. What's more, Canada doesn't allow for mortgage interest deduction yet its homeownership rate is comparable to the U.S.
At least the tax credits are expiring. I say, good riddance.
| April 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |