Posted at 8:00 AM on November 16, 2009
by Paul Tosto
(0 Comments)
Filed under: Saving & spending
The Federal Reserve's move to make it harder for banks to to charge ATM, debit card overdraft fees has been widely applauded by consumer groups. Even the American Bankers Association didn't really balk.
But the Fed decision's got me wondering how it will really play out.
Starting in July, financial institutions won't be able to automatically enroll people in ATM or debt-card overdrafts services. Consumers will have to opt in to the service, one where banks often charge $10, $20 or more for ATM or debit-card overdrafts (check overdrafts aren't part of the new rule).
So instead of being automatically enrolled, you get information and if you don't opt in to the service you can't be charged overdraft fees on ATM and one-time debit card transactions.
Sounds good. The downside, of course, is that the bank will simply deny the transaction, potentially leaving you without cash when you need it.
Marshall MacKay, chief executive of the Independent Community Bankers of Minnesota, also notes that processing costs tied to the overdrafts will still need to be covered.
So in effect the new ruling implies that any expense incurred by processing those exception items should be paid not by the person who incurs the expense (overdraft), but by all the customers including the vast majority who do not use the service. There is not a business around that does not ultimately pass it's expenses on to its customers. so it seems very unfair to the majority of bank customers to pay for the poor record keeping of a few.
Overdrafts are a multi-billion dollar money maker for banks. The FDIC in a report last year found automated overdraft usage fees assessed by banks ranged from $10 to $38.
Consumers Union and other groups say there are cheaper options for bank customers, including linked accounts, where money can be moved from savings to checking to cover an overdraft.
But, practically, what will consumers do? Will they seek out the cheaper alternatives? Will they keep the costly overdraft protection on ATM and debit-card transactions? Or will they just roll the dice?
Contact me directly and let me know what you'd do. What's your experience with overdraft services? What better options are there (besides not overdrawing your account)? What does your bank charge?
*******************************************
Click on the map icons below to read what sources in MPR's Public Insight Network have been telling us about their spending and saving in this economy. Share your story.
Posted at 6:07 PM on November 16, 2009
by Paul Tosto
(0 Comments)
Filed under: Education, Jobs & unemployment
Would you be concerned if 67,000-plus of Minnesota's best and brightest graduated from high school and left the state? I think I am.
That's the estimate by the Minnesota Private College Council of students who graduated from high school and enrolled in an out-of-state college from 2003 to 2008.
The council's newest research, made available today, builds on the group's ongoing concerns that Minnesota is a net exporter of college talent and that will hurt the state's economy long-term. Yes, students from outside the state come here. But on average, Minnesota's been a net exporter of more than 5,000 students a year the past six years.
The map below, produced by the council, shows the net migration. Most of it's concentrated in neighboring states.
It'd be easy to look at the data and conclude there's no issue at all. Lots of people come to Minnesota, the quality of life and the workforce is high. And of course, the Minnesota Private College Council would want kids to stay in the state.
So what's the worry? As Minnesota's workforce population ages and shrinks and high school and college graduates decrease, what happens when large numbers of high school graduates go to college elsewhere -- and possibly not return to the state? Who will do the economy building -- and tax paying -- to sustain Minnesota?
We don't really know the answer but we need to. In Ohio, they're wondering why home grown talent is fleeing the state.
As I've noted in a prior post, the export data require a deeper look. If a Woodbury High kid graduates and goes to University of Wisconsin River Falls, he's gone out of state. But it doesn't necessarily mean he won't stay in Minnesota and contribute to the economy.
Still, people like state demographer Tom Gillaspy are clearly worried about the state economy given the aging workforce. If those students leave Minnesota after high school and don't come back, who'll keep the economy rolling?
Click here to see our prior posts on Leaving Minnesota?
Posted at 9:18 PM on November 16, 2009
by Paul Tosto
(0 Comments)
Filed under: Saving & spending
What's with the Federal Reserve? It's going all consumer protection on us lately.
Last week they laid down new protections on some overdraft fees. On Monday, they proposed rules restricting fees and expiration dates on gift cards. The plan would stop many "non-use" and service fees on the cards.
![]()
Companies could charge fees on a card inactive for a year or more (if the conditions were made clear to consumers upfront) but couldn't charge more than one fee per month. Expiration dates would have to be set at least five years after the card was issued.
Gift cards have become the present this decade because they're convenient, easy to buy and send -- and we're able to avoid that really awkward moment of disappointment when people get you something you hate!
In its 2009 holiday shopping survey, the consulting firm Deloitte LLP found:
Gift cards hold their first-place position for the sixth year in a row, with 64 percent of consumers planning to buy them as presents. While the number of gift cards they plan to purchase remains nearly flat (5.4 from 5.3 last year), consumers' planned spending per card is $35, which is up from $28 last year and nearly back to the pre-recession average of $36 in 2007.
Minnesota in 2007 stopped businesses from selling a gift card carrying an expiration date or a service fee of any kind, including for "non-use."
By the way, the Fed was directed by Congress to take action on gift card charges as part of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009.
*************************
Will you spend the $35 per card average Deloitte's predicting? What kind of spending plans do you have for the holiday season? Click here and share your story.
Click on the map icons below to read what sources in MPR's Public Insight Network have been telling us about their spending and saving in this economy. Share your story.
| November 2009 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||