Tools
Links
January 23, 2006

One, Two, Gaze At My Shoe

There's been some discussion around here today about the phrase "shoe-gazer music," after it's usage in an article about The Current this past weekend. (one member of MPR's classical music team -- KSJN et. al. -- sent an e-mail around wondering what the term meant). There seems to be some confusion in the general public as well, and understandably so, since the term seems like it could denote generally dour, depressing music that would cause one to bow one's head.

Well not quite. For those of us who loved (and still love) the form, accuracy of terms is important. Wikipedia, for my money, has the definitive entry.

Given that background, I'll pose the question: does The Current play too much? (My first reaction was, "You're kidding, right? Of course we don't"). But, people hear different things, of course.

Posted by Steve Seel at 3:19 PM

Comments

Nope; I think it's a great thing to hear shoegazer tunes {Esp. Valentine, Lush, Ride, Slowdive & Cranes}...You guys also do a fun little Madchester thingy, too, from time to time...although regarding that era, I'd dig hearing Julian Cope's "Beautiful Love" at some point, please. Also--it is groovy when you do some worldbeat and old jazz and blues...also the fun accordion stuff. Diveristy rules. A bit more house would be appreciated...happy house classics or the Latino stuff (see Giantstep Records). Thanks, Current!

Posted by juniper at January 23, 2006 3:29 PM



Clearly the Current should replace all shoegazer music with commercials.

/sarcasm

Posted by bsimon at January 23, 2006 3:31 PM



What a silly question!

In all seriousness, I'd bet that the person who wrote that didn't know or understand the definition of "shoe gazing music" (I know I didn't until I looked it up on Wikipedia) because the Current doesn't overplay ANY of the artists noted in the Wikipedia article. I bet they were confusing it with "EMO".

Posted by auntie at January 23, 2006 4:24 PM



Either emo, or just the earnest acoustic singer-songwriters that we supposedly play too much. I will admit to playing a good deal of that (Aimee Mann, American Music Club, Emiliana Torini, Low, etc.), but again, do we play too much?

For perspective, I always think of the folks who complain that we play "too much rap." I think that if you dislike any form of music, you're always gonna think that we play too much of it. That's the subjective nature of what we're doing here.

ss

Posted by Steve Seel at January 23, 2006 4:34 PM



I second Auntie's opinion! I'd give a big, fat "unsubscribe" to the uninformed publication that used that label. The Current in no way should be on the defensive. Viva Current!

Posted by toolmaster at January 23, 2006 4:34 PM



I couldn't be happier with the stuff you guys (and girls) play. Every now and then you play something that, in my opinion blows, but the occassional crappy song is well worth the variety of stuff we get to hear because the Current is around. I hope the DJs never sacrifice playing something different because they are afraid of the backlash from certain segments of the audience. The comic book guys are always going to find something to complain about anyway...

On that note, why not give them something to really complain about? Ever heard Mark Wahlberg's "You've Got the Touch" from Boogie Nights? That is my personal favorite terrible song, but I've also never heard a Hasselhoff or Shatner tune on the Current, which are also Hall of Fame terrible songs.

Posted by chad at January 23, 2006 5:20 PM



Hey, Steve, I think you're correct as far as that guy in the article using the term shoegazer to denote earnest, guitar-driven, singers/songwriter type of artists. And, yes, you play way too much of that stuff. My friends and family have wildly divergent musical tastes, but the ones who have listened to this station all agree on that point.

Posted by Brian Pitera at January 23, 2006 11:29 PM



I honestly took issue with the entire article. The author gets paid to go to Bon Jovi concerts, what does he really know about anything? He made snarky comments about dance music and Andrew Bird. The guy rated the elements which make the Current great as weaknesses. Devotchka and Ulrich Schnauss are only unpronouncable to people with third grade educations. Maybe he should stick to his own i-pod, and avoid the shuffle function, because changing genres could be 'jarring'.

Posted by Brendan Keenan at January 24, 2006 9:12 AM