On Now

Listen to the Stream
  • Sinfonia Concertante in E-flat 9:32 Wolfgang Mozart
    Berlin Philharmonic
    David Oistrakh
    Igor Oistrakh, violin
    David Oistrakh, viola
    Buy Now
  • Grand Piano Music: II 9:22 John Adams
    Solisti New York
    Ransom Wilson
    Buy Now
Other MPR Radio Streams
Choral Stream
MPR News
Radio Heartland

You can now listen to Classical and Choral Music on your iOS (iPhone, iPod Touch, and iPad) or Android device.

Blog Archive

January 2011
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Master Archive

Contact Us

Purchase the Music

  • Buy the music you've heard on-air! Your purchase helps support our classical service.


Classical Notes

Your Top 10

Posted at 4:33 PM on January 11, 2011 by Daniel Gilliam (7 Comments)
Filed under: In the media

New York Times writer Anthony Tommasini has opened the flood gates on public opinion. In his January 7th article, he imagines creating a Top 10 list of composers of all time and starts pitting Bach against Handel (assuming only one could make the list). In his follow-up he names the "Vienna Four": Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert. With no lack of space in the digital world, comments on Facebook, Twitter and emails Classical MPR hosts have already begun flowing. So here's your chance: What does your Top 10 list look like? Don't be shy!

Update: Who will make the 20th Century list?

Comments (7)

mine are the obvious: bach, beethoven, mozart, brahms, mahler, stravinsky, verdi, wagner. and then the not so obvious: schoenberg + korngold. :)

Posted by jen | January 12, 2011 9:06 AM

My list starts with Rachmaninoff. Add to that, in no particular order: Brahms, Schumann, Copland, Ravel, Prokofiev, Poulenc, Beethoven, Berlioz, Bizet.

Posted by Holly Leighton | January 12, 2011 9:22 AM

Sure. . .I'll play. . .Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Brahms, R. Strauss, Mahler, Elgar, Berg, Stravinsky, Shostakovich.

Posted by Reid | January 12, 2011 9:40 AM

Guided by the principle of what I most like to hear (as opposed to influence on others, place in history, etc.):
Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Rodrigo, Mozart, Shostakovich, Bach, Puccini, Brahms, Schubert, Rachmaninoff.

Posted by Dave | January 12, 2011 10:12 AM

Dvorak, Sibelius, Mahler, Mendelssohn, Beethoven, Mozart, Chopin, Hovhaness, R. Strauss, and Wagner.

Posted by Malcom | January 13, 2011 10:03 PM

I can't agree with his elimination of Monteverdi, who really started modern (and theatrical) music for us, and I don't think it's possible to really limit it to ten, but here goes: Hildegard of Bingen, Monteverdi, Bach, Handel, Mozart, Beethoven, Wagner, Puccini, Berg, Britten

Posted by Gary Ruschman | January 15, 2011 10:59 PM

Here's my (admittedly biased) list: Bach, Haydn, Beethoven, Schubert, Brahms, Mahler, Berg, Stravinsky, Shostakovich, Copland. (The last two are quite honestly, debatable. However their music reaches so many people on so many levels I am going to have to put them in there).

Posted by Lisa | January 24, 2011 8:04 PM