| February 2006 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | ||||
Posted at 2:11 PM on February 14, 2006
by Don Lee
Filed under: Musical philosophy
Over the past couple of days The New York Times has run stories about soon-to-be General Manager Peter Gelb’s adventurous plans for the Metropolitan Opera. Times article Gelb plans to commission new works from two of today’s most talked-about composers: Osvaldo Golijov and John Adams. He also intends to hire directors known for their work in other media: Academy Award-winning film director Anthony Minghella will stage Puccini’s Madama Butterfly and choreographer Mark Morris will do Gluck’s Orfeo ed Euridice.
In themselves, the plans are not especially startling. They’ve earned headlines because the Met is a pretty conservative place; many of its longtime patrons are wary of change. Gelb’s history with crossovers may make them especially wary. One of his signature accomplishments as head of the Sony Classical record label was the soundtrack for the movie Titanic, a cash cow he seemed not at all embarrassed to milk.
While we may not consider Titanic classical music and we may suspect the purity of Gelb’s motives at Sony, we should be open to efforts to expand and contemporize our definition of classical music. Puccini and Gluck will survive. It’s their successors we need to worry about.